tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091060397245050674.post7892312185712615879..comments2023-02-24T00:50:55.288-08:00Comments on JFK: Has the Zapruder film been altered?Hasan Yusufhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10662154848135364660noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091060397245050674.post-80180279546519027982013-05-29T09:30:55.038-07:002013-05-29T09:30:55.038-07:00Thanks for your comment, mikiestar
I can accept t...Thanks for your comment, mikiestar<br /><br />I can accept that frames were removed from the Zapruder film, but I don't believe that it was altered in the way in which people like Jim Fetzer and David Mantik have argued it was.Hasan Yusufhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10662154848135364660noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4091060397245050674.post-65116638768401932382013-05-27T22:44:32.171-07:002013-05-27T22:44:32.171-07:00You have an excellent blogsite. Respectfully, the ...You have an excellent blogsite. Respectfully, the Z film is altered as a factual matter. The extent I do not know, but at minimum many frames are missing. I attended film school at UCLA and studied and worked with optical printers. Frame-removal without splices is easy via "skip printing" - simply not copying them. I estimate 71 frames are missing from the headshot sequence, based on the artifacts that remain of Greer's head movements. The skips conceal what witnesses described - Greer slowing the limo to a virtual stop, and hence direct Secret Service involvement - and also the explosion of blood that soaked Jackie's clothesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com