Saturday, 23 August 2014

The acoustics evidence


The acoustics evidence pertaining to the assassination of President Kennedy is one of the most hotly debated topics. For those of you who are unaware, the acoustics evidence refers to the alleged recording of the shots fired during the assassination on the Dictabelt recording of channel one of the DPD radio communications. Researcher Donald Byron Thomas posits that based on his analysis of the acoustics evidence; there were a total of five audible shots fired during the assassination. Although I don’t agree with Thomas’ conclusion, in part three of my review of his book Hear No Evil: Social Constructivism and the Forensic Evidence in the Kennedy Assassination, I discussed why I believe there is some validity to the acoustics evidence (click here to read through my discussion).


The reader may also be interested in viewing this discussion of the acoustics evidence; in which it is also posited that there were five shots fired during the assassination. As the acoustics evidence is the one thing which can prove beyond a doubt whether there were more than three shots fired (and more than one rifle used), the Dictabelt recording should be analysed using the most sophisticated acoustical analysis software and equipment in the World. The fact that the U.S. Government has never commissioned such an analysis in recent years just goes to show that they don’t give a shit about what the truth is behind the assassination. 

Monday, 11 August 2014

A big thank you to the readers of my blog!


Exactly two years ago from this day is when I posted my very first article on my blog. Since that time, my blog has received over 47,500 views. I would like to thank the readers of my blog for taking the time to read through my various essays, articles, and book reviews. I would also like to thank everyone who has publicly recommended my blog; including all the people who are regular followers of my blog. I hope that most of you have found my essays and articles to be of some value.

Friday, 1 August 2014

Gerald Hill's arrival at the Texas Theater


Continued from the essay entitled Gerald Hill and the Tippit murder scene – Part 2 posted on this blog:

Hill told the Warren Commission that after he had spoken to the two women who allegedly worked at the Abundant Life Temple, he went to the Texas Theater with a DPD accident investigator named Bob Apple. According to Hill; “An accident investigator named Bob Apple was at the [Abundant Life Temple] at the time, and we were standing there together near his car when the call came out that the suspect had been seen entering the Texas Theatre” (WC Volume VII, page 49). He went on to explain that he “…got in Apple’s car…and pulled up as close to the front of the theatre as we could. There were already two or three officers at the location. I asked if it was covered off at the back” and that “…from the time we heard the first call to the time we got to the theater, the call came on over the radio that the suspect was believed to be in the balcony” (ibid). According to the personnel assignments booklet of the DPD, Bob Apple was indeed working as an accident investigator for the DPD in November, 1963 (WC Volume XIX, Batchelor Exhibit No. 5002).
Although Hill also told Larry Sneed that he went to the Theater with Bob Apple, there are also many problems with this claim (Sneed, No More Silence, page 296). First of all, consider that according to tape recordings of the DPD radio communications (available here on John McAdams’ website), Hill asked the dispatchers on channel one the following question after they had put out the broadcast that Tippit’s killer was inside the Texas Theater, and believed to be hiding in the balcony; “Do you have any additional information on this Oak Cliff suspect?” To which one of the dispatchers responded “at the Texas Theater 550/2.” Hill acknowledged this by merely saying “10-4.” But if Hill already knew that the suspect was reported to be in the Theater, then what other information could he have been seeking from the dispatchers? More to the point, if Hill already knew that the suspect was reported to be in the Theater; and was truly seeking additional information on the suspect, then surely he would have asked the dispatchers a question such as “Yes, I already have that information, but what other information do you have concerning the suspect?,” instead of merely acknowledging the dispatcher’s transmission to him with “10-4.”

With that in mind, it is apparent that Hill was lying when he told the Warren Commission that he was standing near Bob Apple’s car when it was reported over the DPD radio that the suspect was in the Texas Theater. Readers should also keep in mind that there is absolutely no confirmation from Bob Apple that he was at the Texas Theater; let alone at the Tippit murder scene. The transcripts of the DPD radio communications show that on the day of the assassination, Apple was assigned radio number 243 (WCE 705/1974). Although the dispatchers on channel one of the DPD radio asked for Apple’s location, there was no response from Apple. In his book, Dale Myers writes that former Dallas Morning News reporter Jim Ewell went to the Texas Theater with Hill and Apple (With Malice, Chapter 6). In his endnotes, Myers sources this claim to the article entitled Eye witnesses to Tragedy: The inside stories of how a band of reporters covered Kennedy’s assassination, which was edited by Dallas Morning News staff writer, Kent Biffle (this article can be read here).

According to the aforementioned article, Ewell claimed that; “The radio reported that the suspect had been seen entering the Texas Theater. I saw Sgt. Hill running toward a squad car and I ran after it, too. The driver didn’t notice me hanging onto the rear door handle as he sped off.” The first problem with Ewell’s claim is that as pointed out above, Hill told the Warren Commission that he was standing near Bob Apple’s car when he allegedly received the information over the DPD radio that the suspect was inside the Texas Theater. Secondly, Ewell told Larry Sneed that he went to the theater with Captain W.R. Westbrook and Sgt. R.D. (Henry) Stringer; and made no mention of going there with Hill (Sneed, No More Silence, page 8). Furthermore, former Dallas Morning News reporter Hugh Aynesworth; a man who by no means should be considered a reliable source of information (see here for why), told Larry Sneed in so many words that Ewell rode to the Texas Theater inside the unmarked DPD car which took Oswald to Police headquarters following his arrest (ibid, page 26).

In an online article entitled Hugh Aynesworth: ‘I felt meek and almost humble’, Aynesworth writes that after the unmarked DPD car in which Oswald was placed “…sped out toward the police station, Jim Ewell scratched his head and said, ‘Why that's the car I came over here in --- with Jerry Hill --- I don't know why I didn't ride back with them. I just didn't think’” (see here). Although Ewell told Sneed that Oswald was placed into the same car which took him to the Theater, both of these claims are falsehoods (ibid, page 10). The unmarked DPD squad car which took Oswald to DPD headquarters was occupied by detectives Bob Carroll and Kenneth Lyon, both of whom were assigned to the special services bureau of the DPD (WC Volume VII, pages 19, 21 and 50). We should also bear in mind that Hill never mentioned during his testimony before the Warren Commission (or during his interview with Larry Sneed) that Ewell was in the car with him when he went to the Theater; despite the fact that he had no problem remembering that Ewell went with him to Dealey Plaza from Police headquarters, and that Ewell allegedly wanted to go to the Tippit murder scene with him in Sgt. Owens car (ibid, page 47).

It is apparent that Ewell and perhaps Aynesworth were lying when they stated that Ewell went to the Theater with Hill. The question, of course, is why? As many researchers such as Jim DiEugenio have noted, Aynesworth is a dyed-in-the-wool defender of the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald (acting alone) assassinated President Kennedy and then shot Tippit. He is also well known for ridiculing conspiracy theories pertaining to the assassination. Also, consider that Aynesworth had placed informants inside the offices of New Orleans district attorney, Jim Garrison; during Garrison’s investigation into the assassination (Dallas Municipal archives Box 18, Folder 3, Item 6). In the aforementioned article entitled Hugh Aynesworth: ‘I felt meek and almost humble,’ Aynesworth explains that he was at the Texas Theater during Oswald’s arrest, and that after Officer McDonald approached Oswald, Oswald allegedly said words to the effect “Well, this is it.”

Aynesworth also claimed that he interviewed McDonald following Oswald’s arrest, and that after he asked McDonald “What did [Oswald] say to you as you grabbed him,” McDonald allegedly told him that Oswald said “This is it”. But as explained in this writer’s two part review of With Malice, and in this essay on Gerald Hill, McDonald was most certainly lying about this; and that by implication, so was Aynesworth. Ironically, Aynesworth told Larry Sneed that “Had it not been for the other cops coming from behind and grabbing Oswald [during the scuffle inside the Theater], I think that he would have probably pulled a gun and shot and killed [McDonald]” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 26). This despite the fact that, as discussed in this writer’s two part review of With Malice, Oswald allegedly did pull out a gun and tried to shoot McDonald!

Like Aynesworth, Jim Ewell believes that Oswald shot and killed Officer Tippit. In a blurb for the 1998 edition of Myers’ book, Ewell wrote; “I still wonder what would have been the consequences for Dallas had Oswald escaped? Until author Dale Myers so painstakingly retraced [Tippit’s murder], the person I considered a national hero, Officer Tippit, had remained largely a faceless player in the JFK assassination cast. Yet Tippit’s showdown with Oswald had a momentous impact on the outcome. Thanks to Myers, maybe history will remember the price Tippit paid in the performance of [his] duty in 1963” (this can be read here). As pointed out previously in the essay entitled Gerald Hill and 1026 North Beckley, Hugh Aynesworth claimed that he interviewed Earlene Roberts on the day of the assassination, and that she never told him that she had seen a DPD squad car outside the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley, after “Oswald” returned there.

As also pointed out previously, the squad car which Roberts’ initially identified as being outside the rooming house was the car which escorted Gerald Hill to Dealey Plaza. With all of the above in mind, if Aynesworth had information that Hill was probably one of the Officers inside the squad car which Roberts observed outside the rooming house and that Hill was lying when he claimed that he went to the Texas Theater inside Bob Apple’s car, then perhaps it is no coincidence that he lied about Roberts not telling him about seeing the squad car (provided of course he actually interviewed her). Even if the reader doubts that such was the case, the fact remains that as far as the notion that Ewell went to the Theater with Hill is concerned, neither Aynesworth nor Ewell are to be trusted.

But despite the many problems with the notion that Ewell went to the Theater with Hill, Dale Myers assures his readers that this was the case. According to Myers, Bob Apple, Hill, and Ewell went to the Theater inside DPD squad car 151; which was photographed outside the front of the Theater (With Malice, Chapter 7), (WC Volume XX, Hill (Gerald) Exhibit C). Aside from not providing a source for this claim, Myers never informs his readers that according to DPD Captain Cecil E. Talbert, on the day of the assassination, squad car 151 was assigned to an Officer named E.G. Sebastian (WCE 2645). Sebastian was one of several Officers who were on a special assignment to the traffic division to aid in protecting the President (ibid). The transcripts of the DPD radio communications show that between 2:04 and 2:08 pm, Sebastian informed the dispatchers that he is “…still in front of the [Texas] theatre if anybody wants anybody over here” (WCE 1974).

Given Myers familiarity with the many documents pertaining to Tippit’s murder, it is inconceivable to this writer that he wouldn’t have checked to see which Officer was assigned to squad car 151 on the day of the assassination. With that in mind, there can be very little doubt that Myers deceived his readers into believing that Bob Apple was assigned squad car 151, and that Hill went with him. It is also worth keeping in mind that when Hill testified before the Warren Commission, he was shown the photograph taken of the front of the Theater which shows squad car 151, but didn’t identify it as the car which took him to the Theater (WC Volume VII, page 53). It is this writer’s opinion that Myers deceived his readers into believing that Bob Apple was driving squad car 151 (with Hill inside of it) to make it appear as though Apple was in fact at the Theater, and that Hill wasn’t lying when he claimed that he went to the Theater with Apple. Suffice it to say, given Myers deception concerning Hill and squad car 151; his claim (amongst others) that Hill arrived at the TSBD inside Officer Jim Valentine’s squad car at approximately 12:55 pm is not to be trusted.

According to the transcripts of the DPD radio communications, Hill told the dispatchers to; “Advise someone to get in the alley and behind that building at the fire escape” (WCE 705/1974). Presumably, Hill was referring to the Texas Theater, and his transmission suggests that he was concerned that Tippit’s killer might escape the Theater via the fire escape located at the rear. As stated in this essay on Hill, if Oswald was framed for Tippit’s murder, then there can be no doubt that he was lured to the Texas Theater; and as discussed in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, by all likelihood, Oswald thought that he was to make contact with someone inside the Theater (see under the subheading VI: Closing in). Furthermore, if Hill was given the revolver used to kill Tippit, and then went to the Theater in order to frame Oswald for the murder, then he surely would have known that Oswald would have been calmly sitting down inside the Theater, under the false belief that he was to make contact with someone.

Whilst some might argue that the aforementioned transmission by Hill proves that he wasn’t involved in framing Oswald for Tippit’s murder, as this writer has pointed out in previous essays on Hill, the last thing he would have wanted was for the DPD to suspect that he was involved in the murder of one of his fellow officers.  Therefore, it is entirely conceivable that Hill made the aforementioned transmission so that the DPD would think that he didn’t know in advance that Oswald would be at the Theater, and that he was genuinely concerned that Tippit’s killer would try and get away by the fire escape. As a matter of fact, a similar argument could be made for why Hill asked the dispatchers if they had “…any additional information on this Oak Cliff suspect?” What’s intriguing is that the transcript of channel two of the DPD radio communications available on John McAdam’s website shows that Hill told the dispatchers to advise “someone” to cover the fire escape before the dispatchers announced over the radio that the suspect was at the Theater!

If this truly was the case, then Hill knew in advance that Oswald would be at the Theater. But as much as this writer believes that Hill framed Oswald for Tippit’s murder, it seems highly unlikely that Hill would be foolish enough to tell the dispatchers to have the fire escape of the Theater covered off prior to the announcement by the dispatchers that the suspect was inside, and that Hill actually made the aforementioned transmission after the dispatchers announced that the suspect was inside the Theater (please see under the subheading VI: Closing in, in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice for how the conspirators may have managed to lure the DPD to the Theater after Oswald got inside). In an upcoming essay, this writer will be discussing the possibility that Larry Crafard was the man who shot Officer Tippit.

My appreciation goes out to researcher Jim DiEugenio for generously taking the time to proof read this essay prior to it being published on this blog.




Addendum:

Researcher Steven Duffy has informed this writer that according to Judy Bonner’s book, Hill ordered Bob Apple to take Officer Charles Walker and then go to the back alley of the Texas Theater (Bonner, Investigation of a homicide, pages 103 to 104). However, this claim is demonstrably false, as not only did Hill (as far as this writer is aware) never mention in/during any report or interview that he told Apple to take Walker and go to the back alley, but likewise (as far as this writer is aware) Walker never mentioned in/during any report or interview that he went to the back alley with Apple. Furthermore, as stated above; “…there is absolutely no confirmation from Bob Apple that he was at the Texas Theater; let alone at the Tippit murder scene.” Readers should also bear in mind that Bonner’s book contains no references or footnotes, and should therefore be considered an unreliable source of information. This writer’s appreciation goes out to Steven for providing this information.
 

Wednesday, 30 July 2014

Gerald Hill and the Tippit murder scene - Part 2


Continued from Part 1:

 
Aside from the problems with Hill’s claim that he travelled to the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Owens and assistant Dallas district attorney William Alexander, there is also good reason to believe that Hill was never at the Tippit murder as he claimed he was. Hill told the Warren Commission that after he arrived at the Tippit murder scene, he commandeered the squad car which was assigned to DPD officers Joe M. Poe and Leonard E. Jez, and that he “…whipped around the block…went down to the first intersection east of the block where [Tippit was shot], and made a right turn, and travelled one block, and came back up on Jefferson [blvd.]… And met [Sgt.] Owens in front of two large vacant houses on the north side of Jefferson…” (WC Volume VII, page 48). In his book, Myers writes that after officer Charles T. Walker arrived at the Tippit murder scene; “[Officer] Poe gave Walker the suspect’s description. Poe’s partner, Leonard E. Jez, had been stranded at Tenth and Patton ever since Sergeant Hill had commandeered their squad car” and that “Officer Jez asked Walker if he could ride with him. [Walker] agreed, and Jez climbed into Walker’s squad car…” (With Malice, Chapter 6).
In his endnotes, Myers references the above claim to the testimonies of both Poe and Walker before the Warren Commission. Although it’s true that Poe told the Warren Commission that he had given an officer named Walker a description of the suspect; and that officer Jez got into Walker’s car, there are problems with this claim. First of all, when asked what the full name of the officer was, Poe remarked “I want to say C.T. [Walker], but I am not positive on that” (WC Volume VII, page 69). Secondly, there doesn’t appear to be any confirmation from Walker that he was given the description of the suspect from any officer in person. As a matter of fact, Walker told the Warren that he “…put out a broadcast on the air that there was a person fitting the description on the air that was seen running in front of the [Jefferson branch] library…” (ibid, page 36). Walker’s claim implies that he had gotten the description of the suspect when it was broadcasted over the DPD radio; and not in person from an officer.
The reader should also keep in mind that when Counsel Joseph Ball asked Walker what the description of the suspect which was broadcasted over the DPD radio was, Walker said that it was “A white male, slender build…had on a light-colored coat or shirt… About 30 years old, I think he said” (ibid). There can be little doubt that Walker was referring to the broadcast over the radio by Officer Roy W. Walker (WCE 705/1974). Furthermore, there is apparently no confirmation from Officer Jez that he had hitched a ride with Officer Walker. Myers interviewed Jez in the year 1996, but makes no mention of Jez telling him that he had become stranded after Hill allegedly commandeered the squad car assigned to him and Officer Poe, or that he had hitched a ride with another officer as a result of that. There also doesn’t appear to be any confirmation from Walker that an officer got into his squad car after he arrived at the Tippit murder scene. In fact, the only person Walker claimed that he had in his car after he left the Tippit murder scene was a “newspaperman” (WC Volume VII, page 36).
Given all of the above, Poe’s claim that Jez got into Walker’s car should not be considered credible. In fact, consider that during his testimony, Poe claimed that the first witness who told him that Tippit’s killer was wearing a “white” jacket was Helen Markham (ibid, page 69). However, in their supplementary offense report, Poe and Jez wrote that Markham claimed the killer was wearing a brown jacket (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 1, Folder 4, Item 5). None of these problems with Poe’s credibility (as far as giving the description of the killer to an Officer named Walker and Officer Jez then getting into Walker’s car are concerned) are mentioned by Myers in his book. This writer should point out that although the officer Walker to whom Poe was referring to could have been Roy W. Walker; there doesn’t appear to be any confirmation from Walker that another officer had hitched a ride with him after he arrived at the Tippit murder scene. Also, keep in mind that according to Poe, the officer named Walker to whom he was referring to, arrived at the murder scene after he did (WC Volume VII, page 69). However, the transcripts of the DPD radio communications reveal that Roy Walker arrived before Poe and Jez, and that Poe may simply have been confused (WCE 705/1974).
Suffice it to say, there is no direct corroboration (or any credible evidence for that matter) that Gerald Hill commandeered the squad car assigned to officers Poe and Jez after he allegedly arrived at the Tippit murder scene. It is also perhaps worth keeping in mind that, as researcher Steven Duffy has informed this writer, Judy Bonner writes in her book that Hill went back into Sgt. Owens car with Owens and William Alexander, and started searching for Tippit’s killer (Bonner, Investigation of a homicide, page 93). Hill told the Warren Commission that by the time he allegedly met Sgt. Owens in front of the two large vacant houses on Jefferson Blvd., Owens had information that “…some citizen had seen the [Tippit’s killer] running towards these houses”  and that “At this time Sergeant Owens was there; I was there; Bill Alexander was there; it was probably about this time that C.T. Walker, an accident investigator got there; and with Sergeant Owens and Walker and a couple more officers standing outside, Bill Alexander and I entered the front door of the house that would have been to the west – It was the farthest to the west of the two – shook out the lower floor, made sure nobody was there, and made sure that all the entrances from either inside or outside of the building to the second floor were securely locked” (WC Volume VII, page 48).
According to the transcripts of the DPD radio communications, just after 1:33 pm, Sgt. Owens advised the dispatchers that he and other officers “…are shaking down these old houses in the 400 block of East Jefferson right now” (WCE 705/1974). Although William Alexander implied during his interview with Ronnie Dugger that Hill was with him and Sgt. Owens when the two vacant houses were being searched, as this writer has pointed out in part 1 of this essay, Alexander was by all likelihood covering up for Hill’s demonstrable lie that he travelled to the Tippit murder scene from Dealey Plaza with Owens and himself (Alexander’s interview with Dugger can be read here). Therefore, it stands to reason that Alexander may also have been covering up for Hill’s (more than likely) untruthful claim that he was involved in searching the two vacant houses on Jefferson Blvd. The reader should keep in mind that contrary to Hill’s claim that Charles Walker was at the location of the two vacant houses, Walker made no mention of being there during his testimony before the Warren Commission. In fact, when Walker was asked during his testimony what he did after he arrived at the Tippit murder scene; he merely claimed that he “…started up cruising the area… [and] went up the street that runs north and south and faces the, runs into the library at Jefferson and Marsalis…” (WC Volume VII, page 36).
This writer should point out that former Dallas Morning News reporter, Jim Ewell, more or less claimed that during the time William Alexander was searching the two vacant houses on Jefferson Blvd., he spoke to Hill and asked him who the officer was that was shot. Hill allegedly told him that it was Tippit and that Tippit was probably “probably DOA [Dead on arrival]” (click here to read about Ewell’s claim). However, it is noteworthy that during his interview with author Larry Sneed, Ewell made no mention of having spoken to Hill during the time Alexander was searching the two vacant houses; and as this writer will explain in a follow-up essay, there is good reason to believe that like Alexander, Ewell was covering up for Hill’s (more than likely) untruthful claim that he was involved in searching the two vacant houses. Hill also told the Warren Commission that after he allegedly searched the second house, he asked Owens if he had received any information on Tippit from the hospital (WC Volume VII, page 48). According to Hill, Owens told him that the he was informed on channel two of the DPD radio that Tippit was dead (ibid).
According to the transcripts of channel two of the DPD radio communications, there was a transmission from the dispatcher, Gerald Henslee, at approximately 1:28 pm, where he stated that it was believed Tippit was pronounced dead at Methodist hospital (WCE 1974). Although this could have been the transmission Hill was referring to, we should nevertheless keep in mind that no transmission from the dispatcher specifically to Owens concerning Tippit’s death can be found in the transcripts of either channel one or two of the DPD radio communications. Hill told the Warren Commission that after Owens allegedly informed him that Tippit was dead, he returned to the scene of Tippit’s murder, at which time officer Joe Poe showed him “three spent jackets from shells” inside a Winston Cigarette packet, which were given to Poe by a “citizen” (WC Volume VII, pages 48 and 49). The “citizen” was eyewitness Domingo Benavides (WC Volume VI, page 451).
Although both Benavides and Poe confirmed that the spent shell casings were put inside an empty cigarette packet when they testified before the Warren Commission, the problem for Hill’s claim is that both Benavides and Poe claimed that there were two and not three spent shell casings inside the packet (WC Volume VI, page 450), (WC Volume VII, page 68). The reader should also bear in mind that Poe reported to the DPD radio dispatchers that he had “recovered” two spent shell casings at the Tippit murder scene (WCE 705/1974). During a filmed interview with Eddie Barker of CBS in 1967, Benavides claimed that he had actually picked up three spent shell casings (click here to view the interview). However, given the aforementioned evidence, it is apparent that Benavides had simply misremembered how many spent shell casings he had picked up. Hill also claimed that he told Poe to mark the spent shell casings and to then turn them over to the DPD crime lab “or to homicide” (WC Volume VII, page 49).
At the end of chapter eight of his book, Myers notes that Hill told the Warren Commission that Poe had shown him three spent shell casings, but writes that Hill “referred to ‘two spent slugs we found at the scene’ during a CBS television interview recorded a few hours after the shooting” (With Malice, Chapter 8). Keep in mind that during his interview with Bob Whitten shortly following Oswald’s arrest, Hill claimed that “Oswald’s” revolver was fired twice, and that “…both shots hit [Tippit] in the forehead” (WCD 1210, page 6). In his book, Myers writes that Hill’s source for this belief could have been Helen Markham, who told researcher Mark Lane in 1964 that Tippit was shot twice in the head (With Malice, Chapter 8). During his interview with Myers in 1986, Hill claimed that the only way he would have known that Tippit was shot twice in the head was if somebody who had seen Tippit’s body told him this. On the other hand, Hill could have obtained this information from an Officer who was at the Tippit murder scene, such as Paul Bentley, and who was either told by Markham that Tippit was shot twice in the head or overheard Markham telling another Officer that Tippit was shot twice in the head.
During his aforementioned interview with Eddie Barker in 1967, Hill described a lady witness at the Tippit murder scene who could have been Helen Markham. However, as far as this writer is concerned, Hill never mentioned Markham (let alone any female witness) prior to his interview with Barker. In fact, when Hill testified before the Warren Commission, he only mentioned two male witnesses (WC Volume VII, pages 47 and 48). Therefore, it is entirely conceivable that Hill had learned about Markham sometime after he testified before the Warren Commission. If Hill had framed Oswald with the revolver used to kill Tippit, then it is reasonable to assume that Tippit’s real killer would have left behind the spent shell casings (after smudging his fingerprints off of them) in the hope that the DPD would be able to connect the spent shell casings to the revolver; and that Hill would have known that the killer would do this. If it had not been determined in advance how many shots Tippit’s killer would have fired at him, it is reasonable to believe that Hill may have guessed that only two spent shell casings were found at the scene by the time he was interviewed by news reporters on the day of the assassination. On the other hand, Hill may have been told by an Officer that only two spent shell casings were discovered in the vicinity of the murder scene.
We should also bear in mind that there doesn’t appear to be any corroboration from Poe that he showed Hill the two spent shell casings he received from Benavides, or that Hill told him to mark them and then turn them over to the DPD crime lab upon their arrival at the murder scene. Many researchers believe that after Hill observed the spent shell casings inside the cigarette packet, he reported over the DPD radio that “The shells at the scene indicate that the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 rather than a pistol.” Although both WCE 705 and 1974 show that Hill reported “The shell at the scene indicates that the suspect is armed with an automatic .38 rather than a pistol,” tape recordings of the transmission (which can be found here on John McAdams’ website) reveal that Hill did in fact report “shells” and not “shell”. During his testimony before the Warren Commission, Hill was asked by Counsel David Belin if he made the aforementioned transmission over the DPD radio. The transcript of the DPD radio recordings to which Belin was referring to was dubbed Sawyer deposition exhibit A (WC Volume VII, page 57). Hill denied that he was the officer who made that transmission, claiming that it was “probably” Sergeant R.D. (Henry) Stringer, who according to Hill, “quite probably” was using the same radio number (550 car 2) as he was (ibid).
But contrary to Hill’s claim, not only do the recordings of the DPD radio communications show that he (Hill) made the transmission, but the transcripts of the radio communications show that Sgt. Stringer’s radio number was 551, and not 550 car2 (WCE 705/1974). The reader should also bear in mind that contrary to what Hill told the Warren Commission, during his interview with Eddie Barker in 1967, Hill claimed that Officer Poe had picked up the three spent shell casings from the ground and that they were placed into a cigarette wrapper. However, Hill seemed confused as to whether or not they were given to Poe by somebody else. When Hill was interviewed by Larry Sneed, he claimed that after he arrived at the Tippit murder scene; “A man pointed out a spot and said, ‘There’s some hulls over here.’ At that time, nobody had given us information of what type of weapon had been used to shoot Tippit nor had we been informed that the suspect had stopped and reloaded. So, with four hulls on the ground, you had to assume at that point that [the gun used to kill Tippit] was an automatic…” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295).
As the reader can see, Hill now claimed that there were four spent shell casings on the ground, and that he was not informed that the killer had stopped and reloaded his gun. Hill went on to explain that the DPD officers at the scene marked the area on the ground where the spent shell casings were found, and that after he (Hill) marked the shell casings, he handed them over to officers Joe Poe and Leonard Jez (ibid). This despite the fact that he made no mention of marking the spent shell casings, let alone that he had handed them over to officers Poe and Jez, when he testified before the Warren Commission. Furthermore, Hill told Eddie Barker in 1967 that he did not mark any of the spent shell casings found in the vicinity of the Tippit murder scene. Whilst one might believe the aforementioned discrepancies may simply have been the result of Hill misremembering what had transpired following his alleged arrival at the Tippit murder scene, let’s also take the following into account.
During his interview with Dale Myers in 1986, Hill explained that he had assumed the spent shell casings were fired from an automatic because; “…we had found all the hulls in one little general area… If you find a cluster of shells – say a foot or foot and a half in diameter on the ground – you have to assume that they were fired from an automatic…” (With Malice, Chapter 8). When Myers asked Hill how he determined that the spent shell casings were 0.38 caliber, Hill explained that; “You can tell that from the shell. Thirty-eight’s stamped on the bottom of it. I looked on the bottom” (ibid). But as Myers and several conspiracy advocates such as Gil Jesus have pointed out, “38 AUTO” is traditionally stamped on the bottom of shell casings from a 0.38 automatic weapon; whereas “38 SPL” or “38 special” is stamped on the bottom of 0.38 special cartridges; which were allegedly fired from “Oswald’s” revolver (ibid). Myers then goes on to explain that the shell casings “…linked to Oswald’s revolver are clearly stamped, ‘38 special’” (ibid).
With the above in mind, if “Oswald’s” revolver was the one used to murder Tippit, then by implication, Hill lied when he reported over the DPD radio that the spent shell casings indicated that the suspect is armed with an automatic. We should also keep in mind that the Davis sister-in-laws; Barbara and Virginia, both claimed that they each found a spent shell casing which Tippit’s killer discarded as he cut across the front lawn of their apartment, which was located on the south east corner of the tenth and Patton Street intersection (WC Volume III, pages 345 and 346), (WC Volume VI, pages 463 and 464). Finally, as far as this writer is aware, no other Officer (or witness for that matter) who was at the Tippit murder scene has ever claimed that all four of the spent shell casings were found in one small area; as Hill eventually told Larry Sneed that they were.
In light of all of the above, it should be readily apparent that Hill was lying when he reported over the DPD radio that the spent shell casings were from an automatic gun (please see here for this writer’s explanation as to why Hill lied). Whilst Hill’s claim that all four of the spent shell casings were found in one small area casts further doubt that he was ever at the Tippit murder scene, it is nevertheless this writer’s belief that Hill stated this in an attempt to explain why he “mistakenly” believed that the spent shell casings were fired from an automatic gun. Although many researchers have used Hill’s transmission over the DPD radio as evidence that Tippit was killed by an automatic gun, as this writer explains here, despite all claims to the contrary; WCE 143 was most likely the gun used to kill Tippit.
Another factor to keep in mind with regards to whether or not Hill was ever at the Tippit murder scene is that as even Dale Myers more or less acknowledges in his book, no photographs taken at the murder scene show that Hill was there. However, a photograph taken by Dallas Times Herald photographer Darryl Heikes shows a man who does resemble Hill, as he is apparently walking from east to west whilst looking towards Heikes’ camera (see here). Like Hill, the man in question is wearing a hat and a suit, and appears to be overweight. But if this man was Hill, then surely Myers would have pointed this out to his readers, for not only does Myers identify the various Officers seen in the photographs taken at the Tippit murder scene. Suffice it to say, the reader will have to judge for him/herself whether or not the man seen walking west in the photograph taken by Heikes was Gerald Hill.
Hill told the Warren Commission that after he allegedly instructed Officer Poe to mark the spent shell casings, he went to a “church” (which was actually known as the Abundant Life Temple) located on the southeast corner of the Tenth and Crawford street intersection (WC Volume VII, page 49). According to Hill, he was “…preparing to go in when there were two women who came out and said they were employees inside and had been there all the time” (ibid). He then allegedly asked the two women if they had “…seen anybody enter the church, because we were still looking for possible places for the suspect to hide. And they said nobody passed them, nobody entered the church, but they invited us to check the rest of the doors and windows and go inside if we wanted to” (ibid). According to the transcripts of channel two of the DPD radio communications, Hill informed the dispatcher that; “A witness reports that [the suspect] last was seen in the Abundant Life Temple about the 400 block [of Jefferson Blvd.]. We are fixing to go in and shake it down” (WCE 705/1974).
In his book, Myers claims that Hill did in fact make the aforementioned transmission over the DPD radio, and writes in his endnotes that the so-called witness may have been Jimmy Burt or William Arthur Smith, who according to Myers “…last saw Tippit’s killer in the alley immediately behind the Abundant Life Temple.” But as explained in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, neither Burt nor Smith actually observed Tippit’s killer as he allegedly fled through the alley (this can be read here under the subheading; V: Search for a killer). Suffice it to say, the identity of the so-called witness, including the identities of the two women to whom Hill allegedly spoke with, are unknown. With that in mind, it is entirely possible that Hill was lying when he stated over the DPD radio that a witness reported that Tippit’s killer was last seen in the Abundant Life Temple. Readers should also keep in mind that Hill never mentioned the so-called witness during his testimony before the Warren Commission, and as far as this writer is aware, he never mentioned the so-called witness in/during any of his reports and interviews.
But if this was a lie by Hill, the obvious question is; why did he lie? Consider that if Hill was about to frame Oswald for Tippit’s murder inside the Texas Theater, it would be in his best interest to divert suspicion away from himself. After all, the last thing Hill would have wanted was for the DPD to suspect he was involved in the murder of one of his fellow officers. Therefore, he may have thought that by fabricating the story about a witness seeing Tippit’s killer enter the Abundant Life Temple, the DPD wouldn’t suspect that he already knew Oswald was inside the Texas Theater. Whilst some might believe that this is a ridiculous notion, as Hill would surely have realised that his fellow officers who had heard him broadcast the message over the radio could expose him as a liar, let’s bear in mind that on the day of the assassination, channel two of the DPD radio was used for radio communications concerning the President’s motorcade, and not for regular Police radio communications (WCE 1974). Therefore, if Hill knew this in advance, this could explain why he broadcasted the aforementioned message over channel two instead of channel one.
Now if Hill framed Oswald with the revolver which was used to kill Tippit, how (and when) did he obtain it from Tippit’s killer? Several researchers are of the opinion that Tippit’s real killer was hiding inside the Abundant Life Temple. Although this writer disagrees, it is nevertheless important to discuss that possibility. According to the transcripts of the DPD radio communications, at approximately 1:35 pm, Officer Charles Walker broadcasts over the radio that he observed the suspect running into the Jefferson Branch Library (WCE 705/1974). Bessie Munday, the head Librarian at the Library, informed the USSS on December 5, 1963, that the person who ran into the Library was Adrian Hamby (WCD 87, page 816). According to Munday, Hamby worked at the Library as a page, and ran into the Library because “…he had just heard the news of the President’s assassination” (ibid). Munday went on to explain that Hamby was seen entering the Library by “persons” and that these “persons” had called the DPD allegedly informing them that the “suspected assassin” had run into the Library; which then resulted in DPD Officers surrounding the Library (ibid).
The “persons” to whom Munday was referring to were probably the men whom DPD detective Marvin Buhk claimed were “Secret Service men” in his report to Chief Jesse Curry (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 2, Folder 7, Item 8). According to Buhk, one of the so-called Secret Service men claimed that “…the person [Hamby] who came out of the basement [of the Library] with the others was not the suspect and that he had already talked to him a few minutes previously” (ibid). Although detective Buhk referred to the men as secret service men, the fact is that no genuine secret service agents were in the vicinity of the Jefferson Branch Library at the time DPD officers had converged there. As many researchers have pointed out, on the day of the assassination, DPD officers Joe Marshall Smith and Sgt. David V. Harkness had encountered men in Dealey Plaza claiming to be secret service agents shortly following the assassination. The problem is that no genuine secret service agents have ever come forth identifying themselves as the men who had spoken to the aforementioned officers (please refer to this writer’s article on these so-called Secret Service agents here for more information).
By all likelihood, the men identifying themselves as Secret Service agents in Dealey Plaza were actually conspirators. The possibility also exists that the so-called Secret Service men at the Library were involved in diverting the DPD’s attention away from the Abundant Life Temple, thereby enabling one or more of the DPD Officers involved in framing Oswald for Tippit’s murder to obtain the gun from Tippit’s killer; in order to frame Oswald at the Texas Theater. Dale Myers interviewed Adrian Hamby in February, 1997. According to Myers, after Hamby parked his car at the Library, “…two plainclothesmen appeared out of nowhere and grabbed him” (With Malice, Chapter 6). Myers goes to explain that after one of the men asked Hamby what he was doing in that area, Hamby told them that he worked at the Library as a page (ibid). One of the two men then allegedly told Hamby to go into the Library and to tell the management to lock all the doors, as Tippit’s killer was on the loose (ibid).
It is with little doubt that the so-called “plainclothesmen” who had spoken to Hamby were in fact the men whom detective Buhk claimed were “Secret Service men” in his report to Chief Curry. In an apparent attempt to dismiss Buhk’s claim that there were men claiming to be secret service agents at the Library, Myers writes in his endnotes that; “No documents were located that confirmed Detective Buhk’s report,” and that “It is possible, however, that the man referred to by Detective Buhk was one of the lawmen who originally detained Hamby, and sent him to secure the library doors.” But what Myers doesn’t mention to his readers is that there were also men in Dealey Plaza who identified themselves as Secret Service agents to DPD officers Joe Marshall Smith and David Harkness. Myers also neglects to inform his readers that Bessie Munday told the USSS that the men who had spoken to Hamby called the Police; despite the fact that he mentions in his endnotes that Munday was interviewed by the USSS on December 5, 1963.  
According to the tape recordings of the DPD radio communications, at approximately 1:34 pm, Officer M. Nick McDonald broadcasts the following over the DPD radio; “Send a squad over here to Tenth and Crawford to check out this church basement” (this can be heard here on John McAdams’ website). The “church” in question was undoubtedly the Abundant Life Temple. As stated previously, Walker’s broadcast about seeing the suspect enter the Library was made approximately a minute later at about 1:35 pm. In his book, Myers writes that Walker’s broadcast was made about a minute and nineteen seconds following McDonald’s request for a squad to be sent to the Abundant Life Temple (With Malice, Timetable of events). As this writer has explained previously, McDonald was probably involved with Gerald Hill in framing Oswald for Tippit’s murder (see here under the subheading: When did Carroll mark the gun?). It is therefore possible that McDonald obtained the revolver used to kill Tippit from Tippit’s killer at the Abundant Life Temple (as researcher Greg Parker has claimed), and then handed it over to Hill prior to Oswald’s arrest inside the Theater.
But if McDonald did obtain the revolver from Tippit’s killer at the Temple, why would he ask for a squad to be sent over to search the basement of the Temple? Consider that if both McDonald and Hill were involved in framing Oswald for Tippit’s murder, then perhaps Officer Charles Walker was also involved, and that Walker was involved with the so-called Secret Service men in creating a diversion at the Library using Hamby. Perhaps McDonald’s transmission over the DPD radio was meant as a signal to both Walker and the men pretending to be Secret Service agents (if somehow they were able to listen to the DPD radio) in order to initiate the diversion. Perhaps during the diversion, McDonald and Hill removed Tippit’s killer from the Abundant Life Temple, and obtained the revolver used to kill Tippit from him. In an upcoming essay on Larry Crafard, this writer will make the case that Crafard was Tippit’s killer, and that Crafard was arrested in the balcony of the Theater and taken out through the rear of the Theater, where he was then placed into a DPD jail cell.
The reader should bear in mind that if Bessie Munday’s claim that the “persons” had called the Police is accurate, then the transmission by Officer Walker was added into the recordings of the DPD radio communications; and therefore, Walker was not involved in creating a diversion (the transmission by Walker can be listened to here). The recordings reveal that as the transmission is made by Walker, car tyres can be heard screeching in the background. The implication of the screeching tyres is that Walker’s car was skidding. However, it is not beyond the realm of possibility that the sound of the screeching tyres was also added into the recordings of the DPD radio communications. As for why the DPD may have added the transmission by Walker into the recordings, it may have been because the DPD wanted to silence rumours that the so-called Secret Service men were involved in creating a diversion, and that Tippit’s murder was a conspiracy which possibly involved DPD officers. 
When Walker testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that as he put the broadcast over the DPD radio about seeing the suspect entering the Library, there was a “newspaperman” in the car with him at the time (WC Volume VII, pages 36 and 37). As far as this writer is aware, the “newspaperman” who was allegedly with Walker inside his car has never been identified. However, if Walker’s claim is true, then it seems unlikely to this writer that Walker was involved in creating the diversion at the Library with the “newspaperman” as a witness. It is also possible that detective Buhk was in error when he wrote in his report that there were “Secret Service men” at the Library. However, it also seems unlikely to this writer that Buhk could have mistaken DPD Officers in plainclothes as being Secret Service agents, especially since he also wrote in his report that CID (Criminal investigation division) officers, who wore plainclothes, were also present at the Library. Another factor to keep in mind with regards to whether or not Walker was involved in framing Oswald for Tippit’s murder, is that in his report to chief Curry (and when he testified before the Warren Commission), Walker made no mention of Hill being involved in the scuffle with Oswald inside the Theater (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 2, Folder 7, Item 47).
Whilst the notion that the false alarm at the Library was meant as a distraction certainly has merit, it is nevertheless this writer’s belief that Gerald Hill picked-up Tippit’s killer somewhere to the west of the murder scene using DPD squad car 207, and then dropped him off at a location near the Texas Theater. According to the transcripts of the DPD radio communications, at approximately 1:26 pm, Hill reports that; “I’m at 12th and Beckley now – [I] have a man in the car with me that can identify the suspect if anybody gets one/him, the one” (WCE 705/1974). The same transmission by Hill also appears in the transcript dubbed Sawyer Exhibit No. A, and dated December 3, 1963 (WC Volume XXI). Although the wording of Hill’s transmission varies between the transcripts, all three transcripts nevertheless show that Hill informed the dispatchers that he was at the intersection of 12th and Beckley Streets, and that he had a man (witness) in the car with him who could allegedly identify Tippit’s killer.
Many researchers, such as Dale Myers, claim that the witness who was with Hill in the car was Harold Russell. Russell, along with Warren Reynolds, B.M. (Pat) Patterson, and L.J. Lewis, had observed Tippit’s killer as he made his way down Patton street, and then as he turned West onto Jefferson Blvd. (Russell Exhibit A, WC Volume XXI). When Russell was interviewed by the FBI on February 23, 1964, he (allegedly) told them that; “…while at the [Tippit murder] scene some police officers asked [Russell] if he had seen who had [shot Tippit] or if he knew anything about the shooting, as he told them about seeing [Tippit’s killer] running down [Patton] street with the pistol. [Russell] stated the officers, whose names he did not know, put him in a patrol car and had him point out the area where he had last seen the man with the pistol. Russell stated at this point he left the officers and went in a nearby drug store…” (WCD 735, page 270).
However, it is important to keep in mind that this is not what Russell (allegedly) told the FBI during his initial interview with them on January 21, 1964. According to the report of that interview, Russell claimed that “…approximately five minutes later Dallas police officers arrived [at the Tippit murder scene], at which time [Russell] informed them of the general direction in which the person apparently responsible for the shooting had gone and also the fact that Warren Reynolds and Pat Patterson, employees of Johnny Reynolds Used Car Lot, had attempted to follow the individual as he headed west on Jefferson Street” (WC Volume XXI, Russell Exhibit A). As the reader can see, Russell made no mention of being put into a DPD patrol car by officers. Let’s now take all of the following into account as well.
As this writer has pointed out previously, Hill told the Warren Commission that after he arrived at the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Owens and William Alexander, he commandeered the squad assigned to officers Joe M. Poe and Leonard E. Jez (car 96), and that he then “…went down to the first intersection east of the block where [Tippit was shot], and made a right turn, and travelled one block, and came back up on Jefferson [blvd.]… And met [Sgt.] Owens in front of two large vacant houses on the north side of Jefferson…” (WC Volume VII, page 48). Not only did Hill make absolutely no mention of searching for Tippit’s killer with a witness during his testimony, but as far as this writer is aware, he made no mention of searching for Tippit’s killer with a witness in any of his reports/interviews. A search of Google Maps reveals that the intersection of 12th and Beckley is to the southwest of where the two large vacant houses were once located on Jefferson Blvd. Yet Hill also made no mention of being in the vicinity of 12th and Beckley when he testified before the Warren Commission, or in/during any of his reports and interviews.
Readers should also bear in mind that during his interview with the FBI on February 23, 1964, Harold Russell allegedly claimed that he was in a DPD with officers (plural), whereas Hill indicated during his testimony that he was the only officer inside squad car 96 after he allegedly commandeered it from officers Poe and Jez. If Hill’s transmission that he was at 12th and Beckley with a witness is to be believed, then why didn’t he ever mention this when he testified before the Warren Commission? In this writer’s opinion, it is because the man Hill had in the car with him was Tippit’s killer. But if this was the case, why would he inform the dispatchers that he had a man in the car with him, and also provide them with his current location? Consider that Hill may have thought that one or more of his fellow officers (and witnesses) had seen Tippit’s killer enter the squad car driven by him, and that out of concern that this was the case; he reported over the DPD radio that the man in the car with him was a witness. In other words, Hill was probably covering his backside.
As for Harold Russell, it is this writer’s belief that he was coerced by the FBI into claiming that he had been put into a squad car, as they had reason to suspect that the man in the car with Hill was Tippit’s killer. For those who doubt that Russell could have been coerced by the FBI, consider that during his initial interview with the FBI on January 21, 1964, Russell stated that after he heard the shots fired at Tippit he “…observed a young white man running south on Patton Avenue carrying a pistol or revolver which the individual was attempting to either reload or place in his belt line” (WC Volume XXI, Russell Exhibit A). But during his interview with the FBI on February 23, 1964, Russell (allegedly) stated that he observed Tippit’s killer “…coming down Patton Street and, while hurrying down the street, [he] was ejecting some shells from a revolver which he had in his hand” (WCD 735, page 270). The problem with Russell’s latter (alleged) claim is that there is no corroboration for it from Warren Reynolds, L.J. Lewis, B.M. (Pat) Patterson, Ted Callaway, and Sam Guinyard; all of whom allegedly witnessed Tippit’s killer heading south on Patton Street after Tippit was shot.
Although Sam Guinyard told the Warren Commission that he observed Tippit’s killer “knocking empty shells out of [his] pistol”, his testimony implies that he observed this as the killer was cutting across the yard of the apartment house located on the intersection of Tenth and Patton Streets (WC Volume VII, page 397). Furthermore, as discussed in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, there is good reason to doubt that Guinyard ever observed Tippit’s killer (see under the subheading VII: A bird in the hand). Should the reader remain unconvinced that Russell could have been coerced by the FBI, then consider that during his own initial interview with the FBI on January 22, 1964, B.M. (Pat) Patterson allegedly remarked that he observed Tippit’s killer “…carrying what appeared to be a revolver in his hand and was obviously trying to reload [it] while running. When the individual reached the intersection of Patton Avenue and Jefferson Street, he placed the weapon inside his waistband and began walking west on the north side of Jefferson Street” (WC Volume XXI, Patterson (B.M.) Exhibit A).
But during his interview with the FBI on August 25, 1964, Patterson now (allegedly) told them that he “…remembers [Tippit’s killer] was carrying a revolver in his hand and was obviously trying to reload the gun. [He] stopped still, ejected the cartridges, reloaded the gun, and then placed the weapon inside his waistband” (ibid, Patterson (B.M.) Exhibit B). On the following day, Patterson allegedly told the FBI that after “Oswald” ejected the spent shell casings from the revolver, he crossed over to the North side of Jefferson Blvd., thus implying that Tippit’s killer had crossed over to the south side of Jefferson Blvd. after coming down Patton (ibid). However, we should keep in mind that none of the aforementioned men ever claimed that they observed Tippit’s killer cross over to the south side of Jefferson Blvd., let alone that they had seen him stop still and then eject spent shell casings from the revolver.
With all of the above in mind, it is apparent that both Russell and Patterson were coerced into claiming that he had observed Tippit’s killer eject spent shell casings from the revolver. As explained in part 2 of this writer’s review of With Malice, this was done in order to help explain why three of the bullets removed from Tippit were of the Winchester Western brand, whereas only two of the spent shell casings were of that brand, with the remaining bullet and two spent shell casings being of the Remington Peters brand. Alternatively, the FBI may simply have altered what Russell and Patterson told them during their subsequent interviews with them, to make it appear as though they had seen Tippit’s killer remove spent shell casings from the revolver. But if Russell was coerced by the FBI into claiming that he had been put into a DPD squad car with Hill, why wasn’t he coerced into claiming that there was only one officer in the car with him? In this writer’s opinion, it is entirely possible that the FBI were under the impression that there was another officer in the car with Hill. On the other hand, it could simply have been a typing error.
Could Hill have forgotten that he was looking for Tippit’s killer with a witness, and that he had travelled to 12th and Beckley? Given that he evidently had no problem remembering that he had commandeered squad car 96 from officers Poe and Jez; and all of the other details of his alleged activities on the day of the assassination, it seems highly doubtful to this writer that he did. But regardless of whether or not one believes that Hill had Tippit’s killer in the car with him, the fact remains that Hill never mentioned the so-called witness when he testified before the Warren Commission, and as far as this writer is concerned, never mentioned the so-called witness in/during any of his reports and interviews. Also, regardless of whether or not one believes that Harold Russell was coerced into claiming that he had been put into a DPD squad car, the fact remains that he made no mention of this detail when he was first interviewed by the FBI on January 21, 1964.
My appreciation once again goes out to researcher Greg Parker for generously taking the time to proof read this essay prior to it being published on this blog.


Addendum:

Researcher Steven Duffy has informed this writer that Nick McDonald wrote in his book that he met up with Hill on Jefferson Blvd., and that Hill took McDonald’s rookie partner, T.R. Gregory (McDonald, Oswald And I, location number 1286 on Kindle). However, as far as this writer is aware, Hill never mentioned in/during any report or interview that he met up with McDonald on Jefferson Blvd.; let alone that he took Gregory with him. With this in mind, there is no good reason to believe that McDonald was being truthful. This writer’s appreciation goes out to Steven for providing this information.

 
 

 

Monday, 30 June 2014

Gerald Hill and the Tippit murder scene - Part 1


Continued from the essay entitled Gerald Hill and 1026 North Beckley on this blog:

A photograph taken by Dallas Morning News photographer Jack Beers, shows a man identified as assistant Dallas district attorney William Alexander, as he is about to enter a DPD squad car (see here). There can be little doubt that this was Sgt. Calvin “Bud” Owens unmarked squad car, as Owens told the Warren Commission that Alexander went with him to the Tippit murder scene. As this writer has stated previously, Hill told the Warren Commission that he went to the Tippit murder scene with Owens and Alexander, and that this was confirmed by Alexander. In the aforementioned photograph, a uniformed Officer is blocking the view of the front half of Owens’ car, and therefore, we are unable to see whether Hill was sitting in the front passenger seat. The photograph also fails to show any officer who bears a resemblance to Hill approaching the car. Although Hill could have been seated in the car by the time the photograph was taken, there are numerous problems with the notion that Hill went with Owens and Alexander to the Tippit murder scene.
When Hill was interviewed by Bob Whitten of KCRA radio shortly following Oswald’s arrest, he told Whitten that “That call came out [on Tippit’s shooting] – the acting Lieutenant in Oak Cliff and I were together standing [outside the TSBD] talking to [inspector J. Herbert Sawyer] and he ordered us – being that we had all the Police in town pulled down there on Elm Street – he ordered us to leave this investigation of the President’s shooting and go to Oak Cliff” (WCD 1210, page 3). When Owens testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he was indeed the acting Lieutenant of the DPD Oak Cliff substation on the day of the assassination (WC Volume VII, page 78). The important thing to keep in mind is that Hill made no mention of Alexander going to Oak Cliff with him. We should also keep in mind that during a press conference on the day of the assassination, Hill told reporters that he went to the Tippit murder scene with Owens, but neglected to mention that Alexander went with them (this can be heard here at about the 1 hour, 54 minute, 20 second mark).  

Hill also told reporters that he and Owens were instructed by inspector Sawyer to “…report to Oak Cliff and begin the investigation out there.” Finally, the reader should consider that in the report which Hill wrote out (on the day of the assassination) concerning Oswald’s arrest, he once again failed to mention that Alexander went to the Tippit murder scene with him and Owens (WCD 87, page 196), (WC Volume VII, pages 59 and 60). If Hill really did travel to the Tippit murder scene with Owens and Alexander, it seems incredibly odd to this writer that he wouldn’t have at least mentioned in his report that Alexander went with them. Let’s now look at what Hill told the Warren Commission. According to Hill; “I was talking to Inspector Sawyer, telling him what we found [on the sixth floor of the TSBD], when Sgt. C.B. Owens of Oak Cliff – he was senior sergeant out there that day, and actually acting Lieutenant – came up and wanted to know what we wanted him to do, being that he had been dispatched to the scene” (WC Volume VII, page 47).
As far as this writer is aware, there is no report by Owens amongst the files in the Dallas Municipal archives. Furthermore, there doesn’t appear to be any interview of Owens by the FBI or the USSS in which he explained who went with him to the Tippit murder scene. The reader should consider that Owens told the Warren Commission (when he testified on April, 9, 1964) “Before I arrived [at Elm and Houston], the squad was dispatched to pick up a man – an officer on Stemmons, who had a colored man, who had information regarding the shooting. Since I was close, I stopped and picked up a colored man, a lady and two children, and [took] them to Elm and Houston, and notified Inspector Sawyer of what I had. He informed me to send them to the sheriff's office where they had set up this interrogation room. I turned them over to a patrolman there with the instructions to take them over to the sheriff's office. I stayed with Inspector Sawyer until I was informed that there was a shooting in Oak Cliff involving a police officer (ibid, page 79).

According to the transcripts of the DPD radio communications, Owens reported that he had the man in his car sometime between 12:55 pm and 1:04 pm (WC Volume XXI, Sawyer Exhibit No. A), (WCE 705/1974). As we can see, Owens told the Warren Commission that he informed Sawyer about the man who had information concerning the shooting, and that he was told to take them to the Sheriff’s Office. However, Hill made no mention of this during his testimony. As a matter of fact, Hill’s testimony strongly implies that Owens had just arrived at Elm and Houston; and didn’t have any information for Sawyer. As discussed previously in this writer’s essay on Hill, Sawyer reported the discovery of the spent shell casings over the DPD radio at approximately 1:11 pm. Consider that if Hill was the source of information for sawyer’s transmission, it makes little sense that Sawyer would wait for over a minute before reporting this important information. So unless it somehow took Owens over seven minutes to report to Sawyer (who was standing near the entrance to the TSBD) in person after he reported over the radio “I have the [man] that saw the President get hit in my car. I’m on the Elm Street side of the Triple underpass just before you go up on Stemmons [Freeway],” Hill was lying.

Owens went on to explain “I told Inspector Sawyer that I was assigned to Oak Cliff and an officer was involved in the shooting, and I was taking off, so I proceeded – I got in my car, and Captain Westbrook and Bill Alexander, an assistant district attorney, also was in the car with me and we started out to – I think the call came out at 400 East 10th or 400 East Jefferson” (WC Volume VII, page 79). It seems to this writer that Owens was saying that Captain Westbrook went with him and Alexander to the Tippit murder scene. However, Captain Westbrook told the Warren Commission that he went to the Tippit murder scene with Sergeant R.D. (Henry) Stringer and “some patrolman” whose name he could not recall (ibid, page 111). Could Owens have mistaken Hill for Captain Westbrook? In this writer’s opinion, it is highly doubtful. For one thing, photographs and film footage of Hill show that he was a stocky and overweight man, whereas photographs and film footage of Westbrook show that the was a slim man.

According to Dale Myers, Westbrook is the man seen to the right of Tippit murder witness Warren Reynolds, holding his right arm and looking around, in the famous Ron Reiland film (this can be seen here at about the 55 second mark). As the reader can see, Westbrook’s face looked dissimilar to Hill’s. Furthermore, Westbrook had a pinkish complexion, which earned him the nickname “pinky” (With Malice, Chapter 5). Could Owens have simply misspoken, or was he misquoted by the court reporter? Although this is certainly possible, given the fact that the names Westbrook and Hill sound nothing alike, in this writer’s opinion, it is highly doubtful. Suffice it to say, Owens never mentioned during his testimony that Hill went with him to the Tippit murder scene. The reader should bear in mind that unlike Hill’s claim that Sawyer ordered/instructed him and Owens to proceed to the Tippit murder scene, Owens’ claimed that “I told Inspector Sawyer that I was assigned to Oak Cliff and an officer was involved in the shooting, and I was taking off.”

As for inspector Sawyer, he told the Warren Commission that “…when the shooting on Officer Tippit came in, I released half a dozen men to go to Oak Cliff to help with that” (WC Volume VI, page 325). Although the meaning of the word “released” is open to interpretation, the important point to keep in mind is that Sawyer failed to corroborate Hill’s claim that he (Sawyer) ordered/instructed him and Owens to proceed to the Tippit murder scene. Hill also told the Warren Commission that; “We [Owens and Hill] were standing there with Inspector Sawyer and Assistant District Attorney Bill Alexander came up to us, and we had been standing there for a minute when we heard the strange voice on the police radio that said something to the effect that, if I remember right, either the first call that came out said that they were in the 400 block of East Jefferson, and that an officer had been shot, and the voice on the radio, whoever it was, said he thought he was dead”  (WC Volume VII, page 47).

Hill went on to explain that; “At this point Sergeant Owens said something to the effect that this would have been one of his men… [Inspector] Sawyer said, "Well, as much help as we have here, why don't you go with Sergeant Owens to Oak Cliff on that detail." And Bill Alexander said, "Well, if it is all right, I will go with you." And the reporter, Jim Ewell, came up, and I said an officer had been shot in Oak Cliff, and he wanted to go with us also” (ibid). As we can see, Hill’s testimony that Sawyer told him "Well, as much help as we have here, why don't you go with Sergeant Owens to Oak Cliff on that detail" is not consistent with his claim on the day of the assassination that Sawyer had ordered him to proceed to the Tippit murder scene. We should also keep in mind that during his interview with Eddie Barker of CBS in 1967, Hill told Barker that Sawyer said to him “…well, you know what our suspect looks [like]… you go to Oak Cliff” (click here to read the transcript of Hill’s interview with Barker).

During his telephone interview with researcher Jeff Meek in the year 1976, Hill explained that “…being that [the DPD] had enough help [at the] downtown location at that time, and being that there had been a description broadcast of the suspect in the shooting of the President… inspector [Sawyer] said, ‘you know what the guy we’re looking, you know, we’re looking for looks like, but go out and work on the shooting in Oak Cliff’” (this can be listened to here at about the 6 minute mark). Finally, the reader should consider that Hill told author Larry Sneed that Sawyer remarked to him “Well, I have enough help here. You know what our suspect looks like…You go to Oak Cliff and assist in the investigation over there” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295). Despite the fact that what Hill told Barker, Meek, and Sneed is consistent with his initial claim that Sawyer had ordered him to proceed to Oak Cliff, as pointed out previously, Owens failed to corroborate Hill’s claim when he testified before the Warren Commission.

Let’s now take into account the statements William Alexander made with regards to Hill travelling with him and Sgt. Owens to the Tippit murder scene. During his interview with Ronnie Dugger (the former editor of the Texas Observer and the special correspondent for the Washington Post at the time of the assassination), Alexander explained that after they heard over the DPD radio that an Officer had been shot “[Sawyer] said there was no available car as Tippit was the only policeman situated in Oakcliff at the time. Owens told [Sawyer] that he would take [the] call” and that “…he knew the DA’s phone was covered so he jumped into the back seat with Owens and Jerry Hill” (this can be read here on pages 12 and 13). Let’s also take into account that when Alexander was interviewed by Larry Sneed, he told Sneed that “…a call came in that an officer had been shot over in Oak Cliff. There were no squads in Oak Cliff to cover that, so Sawyer looked around to see who was available. Sergeant Bud Owens had his car packed right there at the intersection and said, ‘I’ll take the call!’” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 531).

According to Alexander, Sawyer then remarked “Well, you better take somebody with you,” and that after Owens allegedly told Sawyer that there wasn’t anybody else available, Hill remarked “I can go if you can spare me!” (ibid, page 532). Alexander also claimed that after Sawyer allegedly consented to Hill going with Owens, he (Alexander) told Sawyer “Well, I’ll go, so let’s go!” (ibid). As we can see, not only did Alexander contradict Hill’s claim that Sawyer ordered/instructed him go to the Tippit murder scene with Owens, but Alexander’s claim that he said “Well, I’ll go, so let’s go!,” contradicts Hill’s claim that Alexander said "Well, if it is all right, I will go with you.” In order to believe that the discrepancies between the statements of Hill and Alexander was simply due to Alexander misremembering what was said, we must ignore all of the evidence discussed in this essay that Hill did not travel to the Tippit murder scene in Sgt. Owens’ car.

We should also keep in mind that Owens’ testimony that “I stayed with Inspector Sawyer until I was informed that there was a shooting in Oak Cliff involving a police officer,” and that I told Inspector Sawyer that I was assigned to Oak Cliff and an officer was involved in the shooting, and I was taking off, implies that unlike what Hill claimed, neither he nor Sawyer were standing near a DPD radio when T.F. Bowley reported that an Officer had been shot, but that Owens learned about the shooting from another officer at the TSBD. Although Sawyer never claimed that he heard about Tippit’s shooting over the DPD radio when he testified before the Warren Commission,  during his aforementioned interview with Ronnie Dugger, Alexander implied that both Owens and Sawyer heard Bowley’s transmission that an Officer had been shot. However, due to the passage of time, Alexander may have misremembered that they all heard about the shooting over the radio.

What gives credence to this belief is that Alexander (apparently) told Dugger that prior to hearing over the radio that an Officer had been shot, a message was broadcast over the radio “calling for assistance to a police officer.” Contrary to this claim, no such message appears in any of the transcripts of the DPD radio recordings. As pointed out previously, Hill told the Warren Commission that “…the reporter, Jim Ewell, came up, and I said an officer had been shot in Oak Cliff, and he wanted to go with us also,” thus implying that Ewell went with him to the Tippit murder scene. During his interview with Jeff Meek, Hill remarked that he believed Ewell did go with him. However, when Ewell was interviewed by author Larry Sneed, he told Sneed that he went to the murder scene with Captain W.R. Westbrook and Sgt. Henry H. Stringer (Sneed, No More Silence, page 7). Furthermore, according to the article by Kent Biffle (staff writer for the Dallas Morning news) entitled Eyewitnesses To Tragedy, Ewell claimed that he went with Westbrook to the Tippit murder scene (click here to read the article).

The reader should keep in mind that neither Owens nor Alexander claimed that Ewell was in the car with them. Hill was therefore mistaken or lying when he claimed Ewell went to the murder scene with him. Although Westbrook never told the Warren Commission or Larry Sneed that Ewell went with him to the Tippit murder scene, Ewell nevertheless claimed that he went with Westbrook. The evidence discussed thus far indicates that Hill did not travel to the Tippit murder scene in Sgt. Owens car. This writer should point out that according to Dale Myers, there was an unidentified fourth man in the car with Owens, Alexander, and Hill (With Malice, Chapter 5). During his interview with Larry Sneed, Hill told Sneed that he rode in the front seat of Owens’ car with Alexander riding in the back (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295). As pointed out previously, Alexander was photographed getting into the back seat of Owens’ car. Although Hill’s claim suggests that he did ride in Owens car, he could easily have learned that Alexander was riding in the back of the car after conversing with Owens and/or Alexander.

The fact that Alexander was riding in the back of Owens’ certainly does suggest that somebody was riding in the front seat next to Owens. Given all of the evidence that Hill didn’t travel to the Tippit murder scene in Owens’ car, this was probably the unidentified “fourth man.” Let’s also take into account that Hill told the Warren Commission “As we [Owens, Alexander, and Hill] passed, just before we got to Colorado [Blvd.] on Beckley [Avenue], an ambulance with a Police car behind it passed us en route to Methodist hospital” (WC Volume VII, page 47). Hill maintained this claim during his subsequent interview with Larry Sneed (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295).  In fact, Hill told Sneed that the ambulance passed “in front of” them (ibid). According to Google Maps, Methodist hospital (now referred to as the Methodist Dallas Medical Center) is located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Colorado Blvd. and North Beckley Avenue.

In his supplementary offense report on Tippit’s murder, DPD Officer Robert A. Davenport wrote that he “…met the ambulance carrying [Tippit] to Methodist hospital” (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 1, Folder 4, Item 6). During an interview with Dale Myers in 1983, Davenport explained that he met the ambulance near the intersection of Zangs and Colorado Blvd. (With Malice, Chapter 5). Myers then writes that; “[Owens’] squad car was approaching the corner of Beckley and Colorado. The officers saw the Dudley Hughes ambulance pass in front of them, headed West on Colorado [Blvd.] toward Methodist Hospital…” (ibid). Although Davenport’s report (and subsequent interview with Myers) provides indirect corroboration for Hill’s claim that the ambulance with the Police car behind it passed by Owens’ car en route to Methodist Hospital, there are several problems with Hill’s claim.

First of all, according to the recordings of channel 1 of the DPD radio transmissions, Hill informed the dispatchers that “Dudley Hughes [ambulance] passed in front of me going to Beckley – he looked like he might have had [Tippit],” after he was asked “what ambulance took [Tippit]” (this can be heard here on John McAdam’s website). There can be no doubt that Hill made the transmission, as it was his voice (listen here for a comparison). Hill’s claim that he saw the ambulance pass in front of him “going to Beckley” implies that he had actually seen the ambulance go by him somewhere to the east of North Beckley Avenue, and not as he was approaching the Beckley/Colorado intersection going south on North Beckley. If he really had seen the ambulance pass by going West on Colorado as Owens’ car was approaching the intersection travelling south on North Beckley Avenue, then he probably would have told the dispatchers, words to the effect; “Dudley Hughes passed in front of us going West on Colorado towards Methodist hospital…”

Secondly, Owens made no mention of seeing the ambulance with a squad car behind it pass in front of him; as he was driving to the Tippit murder scene, when he testified before the Warren Commission. In fact, the recordings of channel 1 of the DPD radio communications reveal that after the dispatchers asked Owens “19, where did the officer go?” Owens responded “I saw some squads going towards Methodist real fast – I imagine that’s where [Tippit] is” (this can be heard here on John McAdams’ website). Although WCE 705 shows that the officer who responded to the dispatchers question was “unknown”, there can be no doubt that the aforementioned transmission was made by Owens, as not only do the transcripts of the DPD radio communications show that the number 19 was assigned to Owens, but a comparison of the voice which made the transmission reveals that Owens was indeed the Officer who made the transmission.

The significance of Owens’ transmission is that he never mentioned anything about seeing the ambulance with a DPD squad car behind it pass in front of his car heading towards Methodist hospital; even though his transmission reveals that he knew where the hospital was located. In Myers book, there is a photograph showing the ambulance (a four door station wagon) which was used to transport Tippit’s body from the murder scene to Methodist hospital (With Malice, chapter 5). Given that the ambulance would have passed in front of his squad car at a high rate of speed, could Owens have mistook it for a squad car? Although this is certainly possible, we should nevertheless bear in mind that Hill’s aforementioned transmission that “Dudley Hughes [ambulance] passed in front of me going to Beckley…” implies that he observed the ambulance somewhere to the east of Beckley Avenue. So even if Owens observed the ambulance (with the squad car behind it) pass in front of him, and mistook it for “some squads,” this doesn’t mean that Hill was in the car with him.

Finally, during his interview with Ronnie Dugger, William Alexander evidently claimed that “The Police car arrived at 10th and Crawford, a couple of miles away, and the ambulance pulled out, witnessed were gathered around as the Police car arrived a few minutes later.” Although this writer isn’t certain, it appears as though Alexander was saying that Owens’ car had arrived after the ambulance left with Tippit’s body. When Alexander was interviewed by Larry Sneed, he told Sneed that “We arrived at Tenth and Patton and found the officer’s squad car, J.D. Tippit’s, just as the ambulance was pulling away with Tippit’s body,” and that “Apparently we were the first Police to get to Tippit’s squad car” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 533). But contrary to Alexander’s claim, the first officer to (allegedly) arrive at the murder scene was Kenneth Hudson Croy; who at the time of the assassination was a Sergeant in the DPD reserves (readers are encouraged to read through the thread entitled Kenneth Hudson Croy on Greg Parker’s research forum).

When Croy testified before the Warren Commission, he stated that after he arrived at the murder scene “I watched them load [Tippit] in the ambulance,” and when asked if other officers were at the murder scene when he arrived, he claimed “None that I saw” (WC Volume XII, pages 200 and 201). Furthermore, Alexander told Sneed that while en route to the murder scene in Owens’ car “We hadn’t gone far till a description of the person that shot the officer started coming over the radio…” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 532). According to the transcripts of channel 1 of the DPD radio communications, Officer Roy W. Walker put out a broadcast of the killer’s description shortly before Owens (or someone else in Owens’ car) reported over the radio that “19’s code 6” (WCE 705/1974). The transcripts reveal that a “code 6” meant that an officer was reporting that he was at his destination (WCE 705).

During an interview with Dale Myers in 1983, Walker claimed that he obtained the description of the killer from eyewitness Warren Reynolds at the scene of the murder (With Malice, Chapter 5). The transcripts of channel 1  of the DPD radio recordings also reveal that immediately before Owens (or somebody else in Owens’ car) reported that “19’s code 6,” officers Joe M. Poe and Leonard E. Jez reported “We’re at the location [where Tippit was shot] now” (WCE 705/1974). Whilst it is apparent that Alexander mistaken about being “…the first Police to get to Tippit’s squad car,” and that Owens’ car arrived “…just as the ambulance was pulling away with Tippit’s body,” he nevertheless failed to corroborate Hill’s claim that the ambulance with a DPD squad car passed in front of Owens’ car as they were en route to the murder scene. However, we should keep in mind that if the ambulance and squad car passed in front of Owens’ car as Hill claimed, Alexander may have missed seeing it because his view may have been blocked by Owens’ seat; as he was sitting in the back of the car.

During his explanation of what occurred following his arrival at the Tippit murder scene in Owens’ car, Hill told the Warren Commission “The first man that came up to me, he said, ‘The man that shot [Tippit] was a white male about 5’10”, weighing 160 to 170 pounds, had on a jacket and a pair of dark trousers, and brown bushy hair’” (WC Volume VII, page 47). Hill went on to explain that after he allegedly obtained the description of Tippit’s killer from the so-called witness “At this point the first squad rolled up, and that would have been squad 105, which had been dispatched from downtown. An officer named Joe Poe, and I believe his partner was a boy named Jez” (ibid). As stated previously, the transcripts of the DPD radio recordings show that Poe and Jez reported “We’re at the location [where Tippit was shot] now” immediately before the transmission from someone in Owens’ car that “19’s code 6”.

The transcripts reveal that the dispatchers were concerned about whether Owens’ was en route to the murder scene, as he was asked “19, are you en route” (WCE 705/1974). With this in mind, it makes little sense that Owens would wait to notify the dispatchers that he had arrived at the murder scene, until after Hill allegedly obtained the description of the killer from the so-called witness. Hill’s remark also implies that Owens car was the first to arrive at the murder scene, with the squad car driven by Poe and Jez being the second to arrive. Although reserve Sgt. Kenneth Croy was (allegedly) the first officer in uniform to arrive at the murder scene, he told the Warren Commission that he was driving his own car (WC Volume XII, page 200). Furthermore, as stated previously, Officer Roy W. Walker (who was assigned squad car 127 on the day of the assassination) told Dale Myers that he had obtained the description of Tippit’s killer from eyewitness Warren Reynolds at the murder scene; which he had broadcasted over the DPD radio prior to the arrival of Poe, Jez, and Owens (With Malice, Chapter 5), (WCE 2645).

Now unless Owens; or the person in Owens’ car who reported to the dispatchers that “19’s code 6,” waited until after Walker broadcasted the description of Tippit’s killer over the DPD radio, and after Poe and Jez reported that they had arrived at the murder scene, Owens’ car was not the first to arrive at the murder scene as Hill’s aforementioned remark implies. Hill also told the Warren Commission that another witness informed him that Tippit’s killer had run into the Dudley Hughes parking lot, and then took off his jacket (WC Volume VII, page 48). Myers writes in his book that the identity of this man is unknown, but speculates that it may have been eyewitness B.M. (Pat) Patterson; who observed Tippit’s killer come down Patton Street and then turn west onto Jefferson Blvd. (With Malice, Chapter 5). During an interview with reporters on the day of the assassination, Hill explained that “…we had a witness that said he saw the suspect stop long enough to reload his pistol after shooting the officer” (WCE 2160).

Although Patterson would eventually tell the FBI that he had seen Tippit’s killer stop still, remove spent shell casings from the revolver, then reload the gun, Patterson made absolutely no mention of this during his initial interview with the FBI on January 22, 1964 (WC Volume XXI, Patterson (B.M.) Exhibit A). Furthermore, as explained in part 2 of this writer’s review of With Malice (which can be read here), neither Warren Reynolds, L.J. Lewis, Harold Russell, Ted Callaway, and Sam Guinyard, ever claimed that Tippit’s killer had stopped still then removed spent shell casings from the revolver (see under the subheading entitled VIII: Proof positive). Although Hill could have obtained the aforementioned information about the killer stopping still then removing spent shell casings from the gun from an unidentified witness, as far as this writer is concerned, no credible witness is on record claiming that he had seen Tippit’s killer stop still, then discard the spent shell casings. Let’s also keep in mind that Tippit’s killer had discarded his jacket in the parking lot behind Roger Ballew’s Texaco service station, and not in the parking lot of Dudley Hughes’ funeral home as Hill told the Warren Commission.

This writer should also point out that in her book Investigation of a homicide, Judy Bonner writes that "A dark-haired man dressed in a grimy mechanic's uniform stepped out from the group on the corner and addressed [Sgt.] Hill” (Bonner, Investigation of a homicide, pages 91 and 92). According to Bonner, the so-called witness told Hill that "I seen him [do] it. I was driving the other way on Tenth [Street]. He fired three shots. The policeman didn't even get to draw" (ibid). Bonner then writes that after Hill asked the so-called witness "Can you give us a description?" the “witness” told him; "Yeah, he was thin, not to tall-I'd say about five feet ten-with dark hair. He was wearing one of those Eisenhower-type windbreaker jackets… "Light coloured. Grey or tan, I think. Or it might have been white” (ibid). Although the so-called witness sounds like Domingo Benavides; who worked for the Harris bros. auto sales as a mechanic, the problem is that Benavides told the Warren Commission that after Tippit was shot “[Tippit’s] gun was in his hand and he was partially lying on his gun in his right hand. He was partially lying on his gun and his hand, too” (WC Volume VI, page 449).

Readers should also bear in mind that Benavides told the Warren Commission that Tippit’s killer was wearing a “light-beige” jacket, and never claimed that it was an Eisenhower-type windbreaker jacket (ibid, page 450). Although Benavides identified WCE 163 (the dark greyish blue jacket Oswald allegedly left at the TSBD on the day of the assassination) as the one the killer was wearing, instead of the light gray jacket (WCE 162), it’s entirely possible that counsel David Belin misspoke, or that he was misquoted by the court reporter who transcribed Benavides testimony. But most significantly of all, when Counsel David Belin asked Benavides “When the officers came out [to the murder scene], did you tell them what you had seen?” Benavides claimed that he didn’t! (ibid, page 451). It is also important to keep in mind that Bonner’s book contains absolutely no references, and doesn’t have an index. This writer is also unaware of any other witness who was allegedly dressed in a mechanics uniform, and who was “…driving the other way on Tenth [Street].” Suffice it to say, there is no good reason to believe that Hill ever spoke to such a witness.

On a final note, Hill claimed during his interview with Larry Sneed that Tippit’s revolver was laying on the ground after he arrived at the murder scene (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295). However, during his testimony before the Warren Commission, Ted Callaway, who allegedly witnessed Tippit’s killer heading down Patton Street, claimed that he; “…picked [Tippit’s] gun up and laid it on the hood of [Tippit’s] squad car, and then someone put it in the front seat of [his] squad car. Then after I helped load Officer Tippit in the ambulance, I got the gun out of the car…” (WC Volume III, page 354). The man who placed Tippit’s revolver in the front seat of the squad car was T.F. Bowley. In his affidavit to the DPD on December 2, 1963, Bowley claimed; “Someone picked [Tippit’s] pistol up and laid it on the hood of the squad car. When the ambulance left, I took the gun and put it inside [Tippit’s] squad car…The Police arrived and I talked to a Police sergeant at the scene” (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 2, Folder 3, Item 14).

The Police Sergeant to whom Bowley spoke to was probably reserve Sgt. Kenneth Croy. Although Bowley’s statement implies that Croy arrived at the murder scene after the ambulance left, as stated previously, Croy told the Warren Commission that he observed Tippit being placed into the ambulance. Also, given the fact that Hill claimed the ambulance carrying Tippit’s body passed in front of him as he was en route to the murder scene, and that (as far as this writer is aware) there is no corroboration from either Sgt. Owens or William Alexander that Tippit’s gun was laying on the ground as they arrived at the murder scene, it is apparent that Hill was mistaken or lying. Given all of the evidence discussed previously, it is highly doubtful that Hill ever travelled to the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Owens and William Alexander, but instead was one of the two officers inside squad car 207; which Earlene Roberts observed in front of the rooming house on 1026 North Beckley Avenue.

As discussed in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, there is good reason to believe that Tippit was shot at approximately 1:06 pm (see under the subheading IV: Murder on Tenth Street). William Lawrence Smith, who was working as a brick layer near the intersection of Tenth and Denver streets in Oak Cliff, told the FBI on January 11, 1964, that as he was walking east to a cafĂ© on Tenth and Marsalis streets, he passed by a man walking west, whom he believed was Oswald (WCD 329, page 83). Therefore, if Hill picked up Tippit’s killer in squad car 207, he would have dropped him off somewhere between Denver and Marsalis Streets. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that Tippit’s killer was dropped off near the intersection of Tenth and Marsalis streets. According to Google maps, the distance from 1026 North Beckley to the intersection of Tenth and Marsalis Streets via North Crawford, then East Davis, then eighth, then North Marsalis Streets is about 1.2 miles.

At an average speed of about 45 miles per hour, squad car 207 could have arrived near the intersection of Tenth and Marsalis Streets in about 1 minute and 40 seconds. Furthermore, according to Google maps, the distance from the intersection of Tenth and North Marsalis streets to the intersection of Tenth and Patton Streets is about 0.2 miles (322 m). At an average walking speed of 5 km/h, Tippit’s killer could have met up with Tippit in about 4 minutes. Therefore, if Tippit’s killer got into squad car 207 at about 1:02 pm, he could have shot Tippit between 1:07 and 1:08 pm. Despite what the reader may believe, there is nevertheless good reason to believe that it was Hill who was in front of the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley inside squad car 207. As for the identity of the Officer with Hill (per the statements by Earlene Roberts), although this writer thought that it might have been Jim Valentine, a photograph taken by Dallas Times Herald staff photographer, William Allen, shows Valentine pointing to the location where the rifle was discovered on the sixth floor of the TSBD (see here). The name “J.M. Valentine” can be faintly read on his name tag. According to Dallas deputy Sheriff, Eugene Boone, and deputy constable, Seymour Weitzman, the rifle was found at 1:22 pm (WC Volume XIX, Decker exhibit 5323).

Although some might argue that it would have been extremely foolish for Hill to have commandeered the squad car which took him to Dealey Plaza; as he probably would have realised that someone inside the rooming house would have been able to recall the number of the car, and that the car would have been traced back to him, it is this writer’s belief that Hill probably realised that it wouldn’t have made a difference. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that after Hill arrived at Dealey Plaza in Officer Valentine’s car, he took the keys to squad car 150 from the officer(s) who was assigned to that car instead of the keys to Valentine’s car. Consider that Hill may have thought that after the DPD started an investigation to determine the identities of the officers who were outside the rooming house inside car 150, the officer(s) who had given the keys to that car to Hill could have identified him (Hill) as the officer to whom the keys were given.

Furthermore, we should bear in mind that Hill may have thought that since the DPD most likely would have covered up the presence of the squad car outside the rooming house; in order to dispel any rumours that the DPD were involved in Tippit’s murder with Oswald, that it wouldn’t matter which squad car he commandeered. To put it another way, if Hill was arrogant and brazen enough to frame an innocent man for the murder of one of his fellow officers in the presence of other officers inside the Texas Theater, then it only stands to reason that Hill was also arrogant and brazen enough to risk being identified as one of the two officers in front of the rooming house inside squad car 207. Whilst some might argue that Hill would not have reported over the DPD radio (per WCE 705/1974) that he was en route with officer Valentine to Elm and Houston Streets if he was going to commandeer Valentine’s squad car and then drive it to the rooming house, such a belief assumes that Hill had already determined prior to his arrival at Dealey Plaza that he would be commandeering Valentine’s car.

But why would Hill then tell the Warren Commission (and then maintain during his interviews with Jeff Meek and Larry Sneed) that he had travelled to Dealey Plaza in Valentine’s squad car if he had actually commandeered that car. Consider that Hill may have thought that by admitting he went to Dealey Plaza in Valentine’s car, nobody would believe that he commandeered it, and then drove it to the rooming house. After all, it would only have been in Hill’s best interest that the Warren Commission and the authorities didn’t think that he was one of the officers outside the rooming house in squad car 207, and had possibly picked up “Oswald” and driven him towards the Tippit murder scene. Although the reader may not agree with all (or any) of this writer’s opinions, the fact remains that Earlene Roberts initially claimed that the number of the DPD squad car she observed outside the rooming house was 207; and that by all likelihood, Gerald Hill had commandeered that car from officer Jim Valentine after they arrived at Dealey Plaza.

What’s particularly telling to this writer is that during his testimony, Hill volunteered that he didn’t remember what the number of Valentine’s car was (WC Volume VII, page 45). One can only wonder why Hill felt the need to state this, as he was never asked about it. In this writer’s opinion, it suggests that Hill was guilty of commandeering Valentine’s squad car and driving it to the rooming house, and had possible made this remark out of nervousness whilst testifying under oath. As stated in this writer’s essay on Hill at the CTKA.net website, the recordings of the DPD radio communications (available on John McAdams’ website here) show that Hill was using Owens’ radio identification number (19) when speaking over the radio, and that this was a fabrication by the DPD to cover-up for Hill’s presence outside the rooming house. As this writer also discussed in the essay, for the same reason, DPD detective V.J. Brain was by all likelihood coerced into claiming that he was on the sixth floor of the TSBD with Hill when the spent shell casings were discovered.

But if this was the case, then why wasn’t Sgt. Owens coerced into claiming that Hill went with him to the Tippit murder scene? Let’s take the following into consideration. Owens testified before the Warren Commission on April 9, 1964 (WC Volume VII, page 78). Detective Brian testified on May 13, 1964 (WC Volume V, page 33). On July 21, 1964, the DPD provided the FBI with “…the original recordings reflecting the radio transmissions of channel 1 and channel 2 of [DPD] radio station KKB 364…” (WCE 1974). If the transmissions made from Owens’ car provided in the previous transcript (WCE 705) were replaced with Hill’s voice by July 21, 1964, then the decision by the DPD to cover-up for Hill’s presence outside the rooming house at approximately 1:00 pm, was probably made sometime between April 9 and May 13, 1964. As the DPD would surely not have wanted the FBI to suspect that Hill was outside the rooming house in squad car 207; since this may have led them to believe that Hill and other DPD officers were involved with Oswald in Tippit’s murder, it only stands to reason that they would have faked the tape recordings to make it appear as though Hill went to the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Owens.

In conclusion, there is one final issue which this writer would like to discuss. As most researchers of the assassination are probably aware, Captain Will Fritz told the Warren Commission on April 22, 1964 “When I started to talk to [Oswald] or maybe just before I started to talk to him, some officer told me outside of my office that he had a room on Beckley, I don’t know who the Officer was, [but] I think we can find out…” (WC Volume IV, page 207). Fritz claimed that this was following his arrival at DPD headquarters after learning that Oswald was missing from the TSBD, and after he had sent detectives Guy “Gus” Rose, Richard Stovall, and John Adamcik to the home of Ruth Paine in Irving (ibid). Before reading what follows, readers are strongly encouraged to first read through this thread on John Simkin’s’ education forum. According to disinformation extraordinaire Dale Myers, the officer who provided Fritz with this information was detective Jim Leavelle (With Malice, chapter 7). Leavelle told Myers during an interview in 1985 that Oswald told him (Leavelle) that he lived in the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley, as Leavelle was questioning him (ibid).

But as discussed in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, when Leavelle testified before the Warren Commission, he denied interrogating or questioning Oswald prior to the morning of November 24, 1963 (see under the subheading VII: A bird in the hand). So who was the officer that told Fritz about the rooming house? It will probably come as no surprise to the reader to learn that this writer believes it was Gerald Hill. When Hill testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that after Oswald brought to DPD headquarters following his arrest at the Texas Theater “We were trying to get together to decide who was going to make the offense report and get all the little technicalities out of the way when a detective named Richard Stovall and another one, G. F. Rose, came up, and the four of us were standing when Captain Fritz walked in” (WC Volume VII, page 59).

Hill went on to explain that “[Fritz] walked up to Rose and Stovall and made the statement to them, ‘Go get a search warrant and go out to some address on Fifth Street,’ and I don't recall the actual street number, in Irving, and ‘pick up a man named Lee Oswald.’ And I asked the captain why he wanted him, and he said, ‘Well, he was employed down at the Book Depository and he had not been present for a roll call of the employees.’ And we said, "Captain, we will save you a trip," or words to that effect, "Because there he sits." And with that, we relinquished our prisoner to the homicide and robbery bureau, to Captain Fritz” (ibid). Therefore, by Hill’s own admission, he was with Fritz after he (Fritz) sent Rose, Stovall, and Adamcik to Ruth Paine’s home. When we take into account the likelihood that Hill was one of the two officers in front of the rooming house in squad car 207, it is only logical to believe that Hill was indeed the officer who told Fritz about the rooming house. Of course, this writer has no way of proving that this was the case.

As this writer has stated previously in the essay entitled Gerald Hill and 1026 North Beckley, researcher Lee Farley has made the case that Oswald did not live at the rooming house, and that it was in fact Larry Crafard who was living there at the time of the assassination (See the thread entitled: A House of Cards? on Greg Parker’s research forum). It is this writer’s belief that Crafard was Tippit’s killer, and that Hill picked him up from the rooming house and dropped him off near the intersection of Tenth and North Marsalis streets. But if this truly was the case, then why would Hill tell Fritz about the rooming house? As most researchers are aware, the DPD claimed that they found several of Oswald’s belongings there. As researcher Lee Farley has pointed out, Oswald’s belongings may have been moved into the rooming house following the assassination by certain DPD officers such as Harry Olsen, whilst all of Crafard’s belongings were moved out (see the thread entitled Randle & Frazier contradictions on Greg Parker’s research forum). If this was the case (as this writer believes it was), then this would certainly explain why Hill would tell Fritz about the rooming house.

Click here to go to part 2. My appreciation goes out to researcher Greg Parker for generously taking the time to proof read the essay prior to it being published on this blog.