Just recently, I finished reading my copy of the book Prayer Man: The exoneration of Lee Harvey Oswald authored by researcher Stan Dane. The book is based on the brilliant research by Sean Murphy; who presented compelling evidence that at the time of the assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald was standing on the front steps of the TSBD watching the Presidential motorcade pass by (see here). Had it not been to some personal problems I have been experiencing for quite a while, I would have purchased the book and read it much sooner. As a matter of fact, I won my copy of the book from a raffle ticket draw at the 2015 ROKC conference in Melbourne. My brother (who attended the conference with me) was the person who drew the ticket that won me the book. I guess it was my lucky day.
Throughout the book, Dane guides the reader through Sean
Murphy’s research which demonstrates (beyond a reasonable doubt) that Oswald
was standing on the front steps of the TSBD at the time of the assassination;
and is the figure which Sean Murphy dubbed as “Prayer Man.” If you want to know
why Oswald was innocent of shooting President Kennedy, this is the book you
MUST read; and as Dane wrote towards the beginning of his book, this is the
book he wished Sean Murphy had written. But despite Murphy’s ground breaking
research, there will always be those who disagree that Oswald was standing
outside the TSBD at the time of the assassination; from those who simply can’t
handle the reality that Oswald was not the lone assassin, to those whose egos
won’t allow them to admit that Murphy has demonstrated that Oswald was standing
on the front steps of the TSBD because they didn’t do so themselves.
One of the most truly absurd claims against Oswald being
“Prayer Man” is that “Prayer Man” was a woman. I submit that anyone who
honestly believes this to be the case needs to get their eyes and/or head
examined by a professional; as “Prayer Man” is clearly a male figure! Others
have argued that if Oswald really was “Prayer Man,” he would have shouted out
to news reporters every chance he got that he was standing on the front steps
of the TSBD building. However, given the utter shock, fear, and humiliation the
innocent Oswald would have experienced after being told that he was being
charged for the assassination of the President, I think it’s only perfectly reasonable
that he would have been at a loss for the right words to say. There is another factor
to take into account in this regard. As researcher Greg Parker and (to a lesser
extent) I have discussed, there is good reason to believe that Oswald was an
undiagnosed sufferer of Asperger’s syndrome (see here). If this was in fact the case, it would most likely have been
more difficult for Oswald to find the right words to say (see here for why).
Some researchers have argued that as President Kennedy’s
motorcade was passing the TSBD building, Oswald was using a camera to take a
photograph(s). Others have argued that Oswald would not have been taking a
photograph(s) from the “Prayer Man” position, as it was a poor position to take
a photograph(s) from. Although I am not entirely convinced myself that Oswald
was taking a photograph(s) as the motorcade passed by, if Oswald was a sufferer
of Asperger’s syndrome, it would make sense for him to take a photograph(s)
from the “Prayer Man” position; as it was away from the crowd and associated
noise. But regardless of what one believes Oswald was doing at the time of the
assassination, Sean Murphy’s research stands on solid ground, and Stan Dane is
to be commended for writing this book.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.