Monday, 30 June 2014

Gerald Hill and the Tippit murder scene - Part 1


Continued from the essay entitled Gerald Hill and 1026 North Beckley on this blog:

A photograph taken by Dallas Morning News photographer Jack Beers, shows a man identified as assistant Dallas district attorney William Alexander, as he is about to enter a DPD squad car (see here). There can be little doubt that this was Sgt. Calvin “Bud” Owens unmarked squad car, as Owens told the Warren Commission that Alexander went with him to the Tippit murder scene. As this writer has stated previously, Hill told the Warren Commission that he went to the Tippit murder scene with Owens and Alexander, and that this was confirmed by Alexander. In the aforementioned photograph, a uniformed Officer is blocking the view of the front half of Owens’ car, and therefore, we are unable to see whether Hill was sitting in the front passenger seat. The photograph also fails to show any officer who bears a resemblance to Hill approaching the car. Although Hill could have been seated in the car by the time the photograph was taken, there are numerous problems with the notion that Hill went with Owens and Alexander to the Tippit murder scene.
When Hill was interviewed by Bob Whitten of KCRA radio shortly following Oswald’s arrest, he told Whitten that “That call came out [on Tippit’s shooting] – the acting Lieutenant in Oak Cliff and I were together standing [outside the TSBD] talking to [inspector J. Herbert Sawyer] and he ordered us – being that we had all the Police in town pulled down there on Elm Street – he ordered us to leave this investigation of the President’s shooting and go to Oak Cliff” (WCD 1210, page 3). When Owens testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he was indeed the acting Lieutenant of the DPD Oak Cliff substation on the day of the assassination (WC Volume VII, page 78). The important thing to keep in mind is that Hill made no mention of Alexander going to Oak Cliff with him. We should also keep in mind that during a press conference on the day of the assassination, Hill told reporters that he went to the Tippit murder scene with Owens, but neglected to mention that Alexander went with them (this can be heard here at about the 1 hour, 54 minute, 20 second mark).  

Hill also told reporters that he and Owens were instructed by inspector Sawyer to “…report to Oak Cliff and begin the investigation out there.” Finally, the reader should consider that in the report which Hill wrote out (on the day of the assassination) concerning Oswald’s arrest, he once again failed to mention that Alexander went to the Tippit murder scene with him and Owens (WCD 87, page 196), (WC Volume VII, pages 59 and 60). If Hill really did travel to the Tippit murder scene with Owens and Alexander, it seems incredibly odd to this writer that he wouldn’t have at least mentioned in his report that Alexander went with them. Let’s now look at what Hill told the Warren Commission. According to Hill; “I was talking to Inspector Sawyer, telling him what we found [on the sixth floor of the TSBD], when Sgt. C.B. Owens of Oak Cliff – he was senior sergeant out there that day, and actually acting Lieutenant – came up and wanted to know what we wanted him to do, being that he had been dispatched to the scene” (WC Volume VII, page 47).
As far as this writer is aware, there is no report by Owens amongst the files in the Dallas Municipal archives. Furthermore, there doesn’t appear to be any interview of Owens by the FBI or the USSS in which he explained who went with him to the Tippit murder scene. The reader should consider that Owens told the Warren Commission (when he testified on April, 9, 1964) “Before I arrived [at Elm and Houston], the squad was dispatched to pick up a man – an officer on Stemmons, who had a colored man, who had information regarding the shooting. Since I was close, I stopped and picked up a colored man, a lady and two children, and [took] them to Elm and Houston, and notified Inspector Sawyer of what I had. He informed me to send them to the sheriff's office where they had set up this interrogation room. I turned them over to a patrolman there with the instructions to take them over to the sheriff's office. I stayed with Inspector Sawyer until I was informed that there was a shooting in Oak Cliff involving a police officer (ibid, page 79).

According to the transcripts of the DPD radio communications, Owens reported that he had the man in his car sometime between 12:55 pm and 1:04 pm (WC Volume XXI, Sawyer Exhibit No. A), (WCE 705/1974). As we can see, Owens told the Warren Commission that he informed Sawyer about the man who had information concerning the shooting, and that he was told to take them to the Sheriff’s Office. However, Hill made no mention of this during his testimony. As a matter of fact, Hill’s testimony strongly implies that Owens had just arrived at Elm and Houston; and didn’t have any information for Sawyer. As discussed previously in this writer’s essay on Hill, Sawyer reported the discovery of the spent shell casings over the DPD radio at approximately 1:11 pm. Consider that if Hill was the source of information for sawyer’s transmission, it makes little sense that Sawyer would wait for over a minute before reporting this important information. So unless it somehow took Owens over seven minutes to report to Sawyer (who was standing near the entrance to the TSBD) in person after he reported over the radio “I have the [man] that saw the President get hit in my car. I’m on the Elm Street side of the Triple underpass just before you go up on Stemmons [Freeway],” Hill was lying.

Owens went on to explain “I told Inspector Sawyer that I was assigned to Oak Cliff and an officer was involved in the shooting, and I was taking off, so I proceeded – I got in my car, and Captain Westbrook and Bill Alexander, an assistant district attorney, also was in the car with me and we started out to – I think the call came out at 400 East 10th or 400 East Jefferson” (WC Volume VII, page 79). It seems to this writer that Owens was saying that Captain Westbrook went with him and Alexander to the Tippit murder scene. However, Captain Westbrook told the Warren Commission that he went to the Tippit murder scene with Sergeant R.D. (Henry) Stringer and “some patrolman” whose name he could not recall (ibid, page 111). Could Owens have mistaken Hill for Captain Westbrook? In this writer’s opinion, it is highly doubtful. For one thing, photographs and film footage of Hill show that he was a stocky and overweight man, whereas photographs and film footage of Westbrook show that the was a slim man.

According to Dale Myers, Westbrook is the man seen to the right of Tippit murder witness Warren Reynolds, holding his right arm and looking around, in the famous Ron Reiland film (this can be seen here at about the 55 second mark). As the reader can see, Westbrook’s face looked dissimilar to Hill’s. Furthermore, Westbrook had a pinkish complexion, which earned him the nickname “pinky” (With Malice, Chapter 5). Could Owens have simply misspoken, or was he misquoted by the court reporter? Although this is certainly possible, given the fact that the names Westbrook and Hill sound nothing alike, in this writer’s opinion, it is highly doubtful. Suffice it to say, Owens never mentioned during his testimony that Hill went with him to the Tippit murder scene. The reader should bear in mind that unlike Hill’s claim that Sawyer ordered/instructed him and Owens to proceed to the Tippit murder scene, Owens’ claimed that “I told Inspector Sawyer that I was assigned to Oak Cliff and an officer was involved in the shooting, and I was taking off.”

As for inspector Sawyer, he told the Warren Commission that “…when the shooting on Officer Tippit came in, I released half a dozen men to go to Oak Cliff to help with that” (WC Volume VI, page 325). Although the meaning of the word “released” is open to interpretation, the important point to keep in mind is that Sawyer failed to corroborate Hill’s claim that he (Sawyer) ordered/instructed him and Owens to proceed to the Tippit murder scene. Hill also told the Warren Commission that; “We [Owens and Hill] were standing there with Inspector Sawyer and Assistant District Attorney Bill Alexander came up to us, and we had been standing there for a minute when we heard the strange voice on the police radio that said something to the effect that, if I remember right, either the first call that came out said that they were in the 400 block of East Jefferson, and that an officer had been shot, and the voice on the radio, whoever it was, said he thought he was dead”  (WC Volume VII, page 47).

Hill went on to explain that; “At this point Sergeant Owens said something to the effect that this would have been one of his men… [Inspector] Sawyer said, "Well, as much help as we have here, why don't you go with Sergeant Owens to Oak Cliff on that detail." And Bill Alexander said, "Well, if it is all right, I will go with you." And the reporter, Jim Ewell, came up, and I said an officer had been shot in Oak Cliff, and he wanted to go with us also” (ibid). As we can see, Hill’s testimony that Sawyer told him "Well, as much help as we have here, why don't you go with Sergeant Owens to Oak Cliff on that detail" is not consistent with his claim on the day of the assassination that Sawyer had ordered him to proceed to the Tippit murder scene. We should also keep in mind that during his interview with Eddie Barker of CBS in 1967, Hill told Barker that Sawyer said to him “…well, you know what our suspect looks [like]… you go to Oak Cliff” (click here to read the transcript of Hill’s interview with Barker).

During his telephone interview with researcher Jeff Meek in the year 1976, Hill explained that “…being that [the DPD] had enough help [at the] downtown location at that time, and being that there had been a description broadcast of the suspect in the shooting of the President… inspector [Sawyer] said, ‘you know what the guy we’re looking, you know, we’re looking for looks like, but go out and work on the shooting in Oak Cliff’” (this can be listened to here at about the 6 minute mark). Finally, the reader should consider that Hill told author Larry Sneed that Sawyer remarked to him “Well, I have enough help here. You know what our suspect looks like…You go to Oak Cliff and assist in the investigation over there” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295). Despite the fact that what Hill told Barker, Meek, and Sneed is consistent with his initial claim that Sawyer had ordered him to proceed to Oak Cliff, as pointed out previously, Owens failed to corroborate Hill’s claim when he testified before the Warren Commission.

Let’s now take into account the statements William Alexander made with regards to Hill travelling with him and Sgt. Owens to the Tippit murder scene. During his interview with Ronnie Dugger (the former editor of the Texas Observer and the special correspondent for the Washington Post at the time of the assassination), Alexander explained that after they heard over the DPD radio that an Officer had been shot “[Sawyer] said there was no available car as Tippit was the only policeman situated in Oakcliff at the time. Owens told [Sawyer] that he would take [the] call” and that “…he knew the DA’s phone was covered so he jumped into the back seat with Owens and Jerry Hill” (this can be read here on pages 12 and 13). Let’s also take into account that when Alexander was interviewed by Larry Sneed, he told Sneed that “…a call came in that an officer had been shot over in Oak Cliff. There were no squads in Oak Cliff to cover that, so Sawyer looked around to see who was available. Sergeant Bud Owens had his car packed right there at the intersection and said, ‘I’ll take the call!’” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 531).

According to Alexander, Sawyer then remarked “Well, you better take somebody with you,” and that after Owens allegedly told Sawyer that there wasn’t anybody else available, Hill remarked “I can go if you can spare me!” (ibid, page 532). Alexander also claimed that after Sawyer allegedly consented to Hill going with Owens, he (Alexander) told Sawyer “Well, I’ll go, so let’s go!” (ibid). As we can see, not only did Alexander contradict Hill’s claim that Sawyer ordered/instructed him go to the Tippit murder scene with Owens, but Alexander’s claim that he said “Well, I’ll go, so let’s go!,” contradicts Hill’s claim that Alexander said "Well, if it is all right, I will go with you.” In order to believe that the discrepancies between the statements of Hill and Alexander was simply due to Alexander misremembering what was said, we must ignore all of the evidence discussed in this essay that Hill did not travel to the Tippit murder scene in Sgt. Owens’ car.

We should also keep in mind that Owens’ testimony that “I stayed with Inspector Sawyer until I was informed that there was a shooting in Oak Cliff involving a police officer,” and that “I told Inspector Sawyer that I was assigned to Oak Cliff and an officer was involved in the shooting, and I was taking off,” implies that unlike what Hill claimed, neither he nor Sawyer were standing near a DPD radio when T.F. Bowley reported that an Officer had been shot, but that Owens learned about the shooting from another officer at the TSBD. Although Sawyer never claimed that he heard about Tippit’s shooting over the DPD radio when he testified before the Warren Commission,  during his aforementioned interview with Ronnie Dugger, Alexander implied that both Owens and Sawyer heard Bowley’s transmission that an Officer had been shot. However, due to the passage of time, Alexander may have misremembered that they all heard about the shooting over the radio.

What gives credence to this belief is that Alexander (apparently) told Dugger that prior to hearing over the radio that an Officer had been shot, a message was broadcast over the radio “calling for assistance to a police officer.” Contrary to this claim, no such message appears in any of the transcripts of the DPD radio recordings. As pointed out previously, Hill told the Warren Commission that “…the reporter, Jim Ewell, came up, and I said an officer had been shot in Oak Cliff, and he wanted to go with us also,” thus implying that Ewell went with him to the Tippit murder scene. During his interview with Jeff Meek, Hill remarked that he believed Ewell did go with him. However, when Ewell was interviewed by author Larry Sneed, he told Sneed that he went to the murder scene with Captain W.R. Westbrook and Sgt. Henry H. Stringer (Sneed, No More Silence, page 7). Furthermore, according to the article by Kent Biffle (staff writer for the Dallas Morning news) entitled Eyewitnesses To Tragedy, Ewell claimed that he went with Westbrook to the Tippit murder scene (click here to read the article).

The reader should keep in mind that neither Owens nor Alexander claimed that Ewell was in the car with them. Hill was therefore mistaken or lying when he claimed Ewell went to the murder scene with him. Although Westbrook never told the Warren Commission or Larry Sneed that Ewell went with him to the Tippit murder scene, Ewell nevertheless claimed that he went with Westbrook. The evidence discussed thus far indicates that Hill did not travel to the Tippit murder scene in Sgt. Owens car. This writer should point out that according to Dale Myers, there was an unidentified fourth man in the car with Owens, Alexander, and Hill (With Malice, Chapter 5). During his interview with Larry Sneed, Hill told Sneed that he rode in the front seat of Owens’ car with Alexander riding in the back (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295). As pointed out previously, Alexander was photographed getting into the back seat of Owens’ car. Although Hill’s claim suggests that he did ride in Owens car, he could easily have learned that Alexander was riding in the back of the car after conversing with Owens and/or Alexander.

The fact that Alexander was riding in the back of Owens’ certainly does suggest that somebody was riding in the front seat next to Owens. Given all of the evidence that Hill didn’t travel to the Tippit murder scene in Owens’ car, this was probably the unidentified “fourth man.” Let’s also take into account that Hill told the Warren Commission “As we [Owens, Alexander, and Hill] passed, just before we got to Colorado [Blvd.] on Beckley [Avenue], an ambulance with a Police car behind it passed us en route to Methodist hospital” (WC Volume VII, page 47). Hill maintained this claim during his subsequent interview with Larry Sneed (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295).  In fact, Hill told Sneed that the ambulance passed “in front of” them (ibid). According to Google Maps, Methodist hospital (now referred to as the Methodist Dallas Medical Center) is located on the Northwest corner of the intersection of Colorado Blvd. and North Beckley Avenue.

In his supplementary offense report on Tippit’s murder, DPD Officer Robert A. Davenport wrote that he “…met the ambulance carrying [Tippit] to Methodist hospital” (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 1, Folder 4, Item 6). During an interview with Dale Myers in 1983, Davenport explained that he met the ambulance near the intersection of Zangs and Colorado Blvd. (With Malice, Chapter 5). Myers then writes that; “[Owens’] squad car was approaching the corner of Beckley and Colorado. The officers saw the Dudley Hughes ambulance pass in front of them, headed West on Colorado [Blvd.] toward Methodist Hospital…” (ibid). Although Davenport’s report (and subsequent interview with Myers) provides indirect corroboration for Hill’s claim that the ambulance with the Police car behind it passed by Owens’ car en route to Methodist Hospital, there are several problems with Hill’s claim.

First of all, according to the recordings of channel 1 of the DPD radio transmissions, Hill informed the dispatchers that “Dudley Hughes [ambulance] passed in front of me going to Beckley – he looked like he might have had [Tippit],” after he was asked “what ambulance took [Tippit]” (this can be heard here on John McAdam’s website). There can be no doubt that Hill made the transmission, as it was his voice (listen here for a comparison). Hill’s claim that he saw the ambulance pass in front of him “going to Beckley” implies that he had actually seen the ambulance go by him somewhere to the east of North Beckley Avenue, and not as he was approaching the Beckley/Colorado intersection going south on North Beckley. If he really had seen the ambulance pass by going West on Colorado as Owens’ car was approaching the intersection travelling south on North Beckley Avenue, then he probably would have told the dispatchers, words to the effect; “Dudley Hughes passed in front of us going West on Colorado towards Methodist hospital…”

Secondly, Owens made no mention of seeing the ambulance with a squad car behind it pass in front of him; as he was driving to the Tippit murder scene, when he testified before the Warren Commission. In fact, the recordings of channel 1 of the DPD radio communications reveal that after the dispatchers asked Owens “19, where did the officer go?” Owens responded “I saw some squads going towards Methodist real fast – I imagine that’s where [Tippit] is” (this can be heard here on John McAdams’ website). Although WCE 705 shows that the officer who responded to the dispatchers question was “unknown”, there can be no doubt that the aforementioned transmission was made by Owens, as not only do the transcripts of the DPD radio communications show that the number 19 was assigned to Owens, but a comparison of the voice which made the transmission reveals that Owens was indeed the Officer who made the transmission.

The significance of Owens’ transmission is that he never mentioned anything about seeing the ambulance with a DPD squad car behind it pass in front of his car heading towards Methodist hospital; even though his transmission reveals that he knew where the hospital was located. In Myers book, there is a photograph showing the ambulance (a four door station wagon) which was used to transport Tippit’s body from the murder scene to Methodist hospital (With Malice, chapter 5). Given that the ambulance would have passed in front of his squad car at a high rate of speed, could Owens have mistook it for a squad car? Although this is certainly possible, we should nevertheless bear in mind that Hill’s aforementioned transmission that “Dudley Hughes [ambulance] passed in front of me going to Beckley…” implies that he observed the ambulance somewhere to the east of Beckley Avenue. So even if Owens observed the ambulance (with the squad car behind it) pass in front of him, and mistook it for “some squads,” this doesn’t mean that Hill was in the car with him.

Finally, during his interview with Ronnie Dugger, William Alexander evidently claimed that “The Police car arrived at 10th and Crawford, a couple of miles away, and the ambulance pulled out, witnessed were gathered around as the Police car arrived a few minutes later.” Although this writer isn’t certain, it appears as though Alexander was saying that Owens’ car had arrived after the ambulance left with Tippit’s body. When Alexander was interviewed by Larry Sneed, he told Sneed that “We arrived at Tenth and Patton and found the officer’s squad car, J.D. Tippit’s, just as the ambulance was pulling away with Tippit’s body,” and that “Apparently we were the first Police to get to Tippit’s squad car” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 533). But contrary to Alexander’s claim, the first officer to (allegedly) arrive at the murder scene was Kenneth Hudson Croy; who at the time of the assassination was a Sergeant in the DPD reserves (readers are encouraged to read through the thread entitled Kenneth Hudson Croy on Greg Parker’s research forum).

When Croy testified before the Warren Commission, he stated that after he arrived at the murder scene “I watched them load [Tippit] in the ambulance,” and when asked if other officers were at the murder scene when he arrived, he claimed “None that I saw” (WC Volume XII, pages 200 and 201). Furthermore, Alexander told Sneed that while en route to the murder scene in Owens’ car “We hadn’t gone far till a description of the person that shot the officer started coming over the radio…” (Sneed, No More Silence, page 532). According to the transcripts of channel 1 of the DPD radio communications, Officer Roy W. Walker put out a broadcast of the killer’s description shortly before Owens (or someone else in Owens’ car) reported over the radio that “19’s code 6” (WCE 705/1974). The transcripts reveal that a “code 6” meant that an officer was reporting that he was at his destination (WCE 705).

During an interview with Dale Myers in 1983, Walker claimed that he obtained the description of the killer from eyewitness Warren Reynolds at the scene of the murder (With Malice, Chapter 5). The transcripts of channel 1  of the DPD radio recordings also reveal that immediately before Owens (or somebody else in Owens’ car) reported that “19’s code 6,” officers Joe M. Poe and Leonard E. Jez reported “We’re at the location [where Tippit was shot] now” (WCE 705/1974). Whilst it is apparent that Alexander mistaken about being “…the first Police to get to Tippit’s squad car,” and that Owens’ car arrived “…just as the ambulance was pulling away with Tippit’s body,” he nevertheless failed to corroborate Hill’s claim that the ambulance with a DPD squad car passed in front of Owens’ car as they were en route to the murder scene. However, we should keep in mind that if the ambulance and squad car passed in front of Owens’ car as Hill claimed, Alexander may have missed seeing it because his view may have been blocked by Owens’ seat; as he was sitting in the back of the car.

During his explanation of what occurred following his arrival at the Tippit murder scene in Owens’ car, Hill told the Warren Commission “The first man that came up to me, he said, ‘The man that shot [Tippit] was a white male about 5’10”, weighing 160 to 170 pounds, had on a jacket and a pair of dark trousers, and brown bushy hair’” (WC Volume VII, page 47). Hill went on to explain that after he allegedly obtained the description of Tippit’s killer from the so-called witness “At this point the first squad rolled up, and that would have been squad 105, which had been dispatched from downtown. An officer named Joe Poe, and I believe his partner was a boy named Jez” (ibid). As stated previously, the transcripts of the DPD radio recordings show that Poe and Jez reported “We’re at the location [where Tippit was shot] now” immediately before the transmission from someone in Owens’ car that “19’s code 6”.

The transcripts reveal that the dispatchers were concerned about whether Owens’ was en route to the murder scene, as he was asked “19, are you en route” (WCE 705/1974). With this in mind, it makes little sense that Owens would wait to notify the dispatchers that he had arrived at the murder scene, until after Hill allegedly obtained the description of the killer from the so-called witness. Hill’s remark also implies that Owens car was the first to arrive at the murder scene, with the squad car driven by Poe and Jez being the second to arrive. Although reserve Sgt. Kenneth Croy was (allegedly) the first officer in uniform to arrive at the murder scene, he told the Warren Commission that he was driving his own car (WC Volume XII, page 200). Furthermore, as stated previously, Officer Roy W. Walker (who was assigned squad car 127 on the day of the assassination) told Dale Myers that he had obtained the description of Tippit’s killer from eyewitness Warren Reynolds at the murder scene; which he had broadcasted over the DPD radio prior to the arrival of Poe, Jez, and Owens (With Malice, Chapter 5), (WCE 2645).

Now unless Owens; or the person in Owens’ car who reported to the dispatchers that “19’s code 6,” waited until after Walker broadcasted the description of Tippit’s killer over the DPD radio, and after Poe and Jez reported that they had arrived at the murder scene, Owens’ car was not the first to arrive at the murder scene as Hill’s aforementioned remark implies. Hill also told the Warren Commission that another witness informed him that Tippit’s killer had run into the Dudley Hughes parking lot, and then took off his jacket (WC Volume VII, page 48). Myers writes in his book that the identity of this man is unknown, but speculates that it may have been eyewitness B.M. (Pat) Patterson; who observed Tippit’s killer come down Patton Street and then turn west onto Jefferson Blvd. (With Malice, Chapter 5). During an interview with reporters on the day of the assassination, Hill explained that “…we had a witness that said he saw the suspect stop long enough to reload his pistol after shooting the officer” (WCE 2160).

Although Patterson would eventually tell the FBI that he had seen Tippit’s killer stop still, remove spent shell casings from the revolver, then reload the gun, Patterson made absolutely no mention of this during his initial interview with the FBI on January 22, 1964 (WC Volume XXI, Patterson (B.M.) Exhibit A). Furthermore, as explained in part 2 of this writer’s review of With Malice (which can be read here), neither Warren Reynolds, L.J. Lewis, Harold Russell, Ted Callaway, and Sam Guinyard, ever claimed that Tippit’s killer had stopped still then removed spent shell casings from the revolver (see under the subheading entitled VIII: Proof positive). Although Hill could have obtained the aforementioned information about the killer stopping still then removing spent shell casings from the gun from an unidentified witness, as far as this writer is concerned, no credible witness is on record claiming that he had seen Tippit’s killer stop still, then discard the spent shell casings. Let’s also keep in mind that Tippit’s killer had discarded his jacket in the parking lot behind Roger Ballew’s Texaco service station, and not in the parking lot of Dudley Hughes’ funeral home as Hill told the Warren Commission.

This writer should also point out that in her book Investigation of a homicide, Judy Bonner writes that "A dark-haired man dressed in a grimy mechanic's uniform stepped out from the group on the corner and addressed [Sgt.] Hill” (Bonner, Investigation of a homicide, pages 91 and 92). According to Bonner, the so-called witness told Hill that "I seen him [do] it. I was driving the other way on Tenth [Street]. He fired three shots. The policeman didn't even get to draw" (ibid). Bonner then writes that after Hill asked the so-called witness "Can you give us a description?" the “witness” told him; "Yeah, he was thin, not to tall-I'd say about five feet ten-with dark hair. He was wearing one of those Eisenhower-type windbreaker jackets… "Light coloured. Grey or tan, I think. Or it might have been white” (ibid). Although the so-called witness sounds like Domingo Benavides; who worked for the Harris bros. auto sales as a mechanic, the problem is that Benavides told the Warren Commission that after Tippit was shot “[Tippit’s] gun was in his hand and he was partially lying on his gun in his right hand. He was partially lying on his gun and his hand, too” (WC Volume VI, page 449).

Readers should also bear in mind that Benavides told the Warren Commission that Tippit’s killer was wearing a “light-beige” jacket, and never claimed that it was an Eisenhower-type windbreaker jacket (ibid, page 450). Although Benavides identified WCE 163 (the dark greyish blue jacket Oswald allegedly left at the TSBD on the day of the assassination) as the one the killer was wearing, instead of the light gray jacket (WCE 162), it’s entirely possible that counsel David Belin misspoke, or that he was misquoted by the court reporter who transcribed Benavides testimony. But most significantly of all, when Counsel David Belin asked Benavides “When the officers came out [to the murder scene], did you tell them what you had seen?” Benavides claimed that he didn’t! (ibid, page 451). It is also important to keep in mind that Bonner’s book contains absolutely no references, and doesn’t have an index. This writer is also unaware of any other witness who was allegedly dressed in a mechanics uniform, and who was “…driving the other way on Tenth [Street].” Suffice it to say, there is no good reason to believe that Hill ever spoke to such a witness.

On a final note, Hill claimed during his interview with Larry Sneed that Tippit’s revolver was laying on the ground after he arrived at the murder scene (Sneed, No More Silence, page 295). However, during his testimony before the Warren Commission, Ted Callaway, who allegedly witnessed Tippit’s killer heading down Patton Street, claimed that he; “…picked [Tippit’s] gun up and laid it on the hood of [Tippit’s] squad car, and then someone put it in the front seat of [his] squad car. Then after I helped load Officer Tippit in the ambulance, I got the gun out of the car…” (WC Volume III, page 354). The man who placed Tippit’s revolver in the front seat of the squad car was T.F. Bowley. In his affidavit to the DPD on December 2, 1963, Bowley claimed; “Someone picked [Tippit’s] pistol up and laid it on the hood of the squad car. When the ambulance left, I took the gun and put it inside [Tippit’s] squad car…The Police arrived and I talked to a Police sergeant at the scene” (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 2, Folder 3, Item 14).

The Police Sergeant to whom Bowley spoke to was probably reserve Sgt. Kenneth Croy. Although Bowley’s statement implies that Croy arrived at the murder scene after the ambulance left, as stated previously, Croy told the Warren Commission that he observed Tippit being placed into the ambulance. Also, given the fact that Hill claimed the ambulance carrying Tippit’s body passed in front of him as he was en route to the murder scene, and that (as far as this writer is aware) there is no corroboration from either Sgt. Owens or William Alexander that Tippit’s gun was laying on the ground as they arrived at the murder scene, it is apparent that Hill was mistaken or lying. Given all of the evidence discussed previously, it is highly doubtful that Hill ever travelled to the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Owens and William Alexander, but instead was one of the two officers inside squad car 207; which Earlene Roberts observed in front of the rooming house on 1026 North Beckley Avenue.

As discussed in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, there is good reason to believe that Tippit was shot at approximately 1:06 pm (see under the subheading IV: Murder on Tenth Street). William Lawrence Smith, who was working as a brick layer near the intersection of Tenth and Denver streets in Oak Cliff, told the FBI on January 11, 1964, that as he was walking east to a cafĂ© on Tenth and Marsalis streets, he passed by a man walking west, whom he believed was Oswald (WCD 329, page 83). Therefore, if Hill picked up Tippit’s killer in squad car 207, he would have dropped him off somewhere between Denver and Marsalis Streets. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that Tippit’s killer was dropped off near the intersection of Tenth and Marsalis streets. According to Google maps, the distance from 1026 North Beckley to the intersection of Tenth and Marsalis Streets via North Crawford, then East Davis, then eighth, then North Marsalis Streets is about 1.2 miles.

At an average speed of about 45 miles per hour, squad car 207 could have arrived near the intersection of Tenth and Marsalis Streets in about 1 minute and 40 seconds. Furthermore, according to Google maps, the distance from the intersection of Tenth and North Marsalis streets to the intersection of Tenth and Patton Streets is about 0.2 miles (322 m). At an average walking speed of 5 km/h, Tippit’s killer could have met up with Tippit in about 4 minutes. Therefore, if Tippit’s killer got into squad car 207 at about 1:02 pm, he could have shot Tippit between 1:07 and 1:08 pm. Despite what the reader may believe, there is nevertheless good reason to believe that it was Hill who was in front of the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley inside squad car 207. As for the identity of the Officer with Hill (per the statements by Earlene Roberts), although this writer thought that it might have been Jim Valentine, a photograph taken by Dallas Times Herald staff photographer, William Allen, shows Valentine pointing to the location where the rifle was discovered on the sixth floor of the TSBD (see here). The name “J.M. Valentine” can be faintly read on his name tag. According to Dallas deputy Sheriff, Eugene Boone, and deputy constable, Seymour Weitzman, the rifle was found at 1:22 pm (WC Volume XIX, Decker exhibit 5323).

Although some might argue that it would have been extremely foolish for Hill to have commandeered the squad car which took him to Dealey Plaza; as he probably would have realised that someone inside the rooming house would have been able to recall the number of the car, and that the car would have been traced back to him, it is this writer’s belief that Hill probably realised that it wouldn’t have made a difference. For the sake of argument, let’s assume that after Hill arrived at Dealey Plaza in Officer Valentine’s car, he took the keys to squad car 150 from the officer(s) who was assigned to that car instead of the keys to Valentine’s car. Consider that Hill may have thought that after the DPD started an investigation to determine the identities of the officers who were outside the rooming house inside car 150, the officer(s) who had given the keys to that car to Hill could have identified him (Hill) as the officer to whom the keys were given.

Furthermore, we should bear in mind that Hill may have thought that since the DPD most likely would have covered up the presence of the squad car outside the rooming house; in order to dispel any rumours that the DPD were involved in Tippit’s murder with Oswald, that it wouldn’t matter which squad car he commandeered. To put it another way, if Hill was arrogant and brazen enough to frame an innocent man for the murder of one of his fellow officers in the presence of other officers inside the Texas Theater, then it only stands to reason that Hill was also arrogant and brazen enough to risk being identified as one of the two officers in front of the rooming house inside squad car 207. Whilst some might argue that Hill would not have reported over the DPD radio (per WCE 705/1974) that he was en route with officer Valentine to Elm and Houston Streets if he was going to commandeer Valentine’s squad car and then drive it to the rooming house, such a belief assumes that Hill had already determined prior to his arrival at Dealey Plaza that he would be commandeering Valentine’s car.

But why would Hill then tell the Warren Commission (and then maintain during his interviews with Jeff Meek and Larry Sneed) that he had travelled to Dealey Plaza in Valentine’s squad car if he had actually commandeered that car. Consider that Hill may have thought that by admitting he went to Dealey Plaza in Valentine’s car, nobody would believe that he commandeered it, and then drove it to the rooming house. After all, it would only have been in Hill’s best interest that the Warren Commission and the authorities didn’t think that he was one of the officers outside the rooming house in squad car 207, and had possibly picked up “Oswald” and driven him towards the Tippit murder scene. Although the reader may not agree with all (or any) of this writer’s opinions, the fact remains that Earlene Roberts initially claimed that the number of the DPD squad car she observed outside the rooming house was 207; and that by all likelihood, Gerald Hill had commandeered that car from officer Jim Valentine after they arrived at Dealey Plaza.

What’s particularly telling to this writer is that during his testimony, Hill volunteered that he didn’t remember what the number of Valentine’s car was (WC Volume VII, page 45). One can only wonder why Hill felt the need to state this, as he was never asked about it. In this writer’s opinion, it suggests that Hill was guilty of commandeering Valentine’s squad car and driving it to the rooming house, and had possible made this remark out of nervousness whilst testifying under oath. As stated in this writer’s essay on Hill at the CTKA.net website, the recordings of the DPD radio communications (available on John McAdams’ website here) show that Hill was using Owens’ radio identification number (19) when speaking over the radio, and that this was a fabrication by the DPD to cover-up for Hill’s presence outside the rooming house. As this writer also discussed in the essay, for the same reason, DPD detective V.J. Brain was by all likelihood coerced into claiming that he was on the sixth floor of the TSBD with Hill when the spent shell casings were discovered.

But if this was the case, then why wasn’t Sgt. Owens coerced into claiming that Hill went with him to the Tippit murder scene? Let’s take the following into consideration. Owens testified before the Warren Commission on April 9, 1964 (WC Volume VII, page 78). Detective Brian testified on May 13, 1964 (WC Volume V, page 33). On July 21, 1964, the DPD provided the FBI with “…the original recordings reflecting the radio transmissions of channel 1 and channel 2 of [DPD] radio station KKB 364…” (WCE 1974). If the transmissions made from Owens’ car provided in the previous transcript (WCE 705) were replaced with Hill’s voice by July 21, 1964, then the decision by the DPD to cover-up for Hill’s presence outside the rooming house at approximately 1:00 pm, was probably made sometime between April 9 and May 13, 1964. As the DPD would surely not have wanted the FBI to suspect that Hill was outside the rooming house in squad car 207; since this may have led them to believe that Hill and other DPD officers were involved with Oswald in Tippit’s murder, it only stands to reason that they would have faked the tape recordings to make it appear as though Hill went to the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Owens.

In conclusion, there is one final issue which this writer would like to discuss. As most researchers of the assassination are probably aware, Captain Will Fritz told the Warren Commission on April 22, 1964 “When I started to talk to [Oswald] or maybe just before I started to talk to him, some officer told me outside of my office that he had a room on Beckley, I don’t know who the Officer was, [but] I think we can find out…” (WC Volume IV, page 207). Fritz claimed that this was following his arrival at DPD headquarters after learning that Oswald was missing from the TSBD, and after he had sent detectives Guy “Gus” Rose, Richard Stovall, and John Adamcik to the home of Ruth Paine in Irving (ibid). Before reading what follows, readers are strongly encouraged to first read through this thread on John Simkin’s’ education forum. According to disinformation extraordinaire Dale Myers, the officer who provided Fritz with this information was detective Jim Leavelle (With Malice, chapter 7). Leavelle told Myers during an interview in 1985 that Oswald told him (Leavelle) that he lived in the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley, as Leavelle was questioning him (ibid).

But as discussed in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, when Leavelle testified before the Warren Commission, he denied interrogating or questioning Oswald prior to the morning of November 24, 1963 (see under the subheading VII: A bird in the hand). So who was the officer that told Fritz about the rooming house? It will probably come as no surprise to the reader to learn that this writer believes it was Gerald Hill. When Hill testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that after Oswald brought to DPD headquarters following his arrest at the Texas Theater “We were trying to get together to decide who was going to make the offense report and get all the little technicalities out of the way when a detective named Richard Stovall and another one, G. F. Rose, came up, and the four of us were standing when Captain Fritz walked in” (WC Volume VII, page 59).

Hill went on to explain that “[Fritz] walked up to Rose and Stovall and made the statement to them, ‘Go get a search warrant and go out to some address on Fifth Street,’ and I don't recall the actual street number, in Irving, and ‘pick up a man named Lee Oswald.’ And I asked the captain why he wanted him, and he said, ‘Well, he was employed down at the Book Depository and he had not been present for a roll call of the employees.’ And we said, "Captain, we will save you a trip," or words to that effect, "Because there he sits." And with that, we relinquished our prisoner to the homicide and robbery bureau, to Captain Fritz” (ibid). Therefore, by Hill’s own admission, he was with Fritz after he (Fritz) sent Rose, Stovall, and Adamcik to Ruth Paine’s home. When we take into account the likelihood that Hill was one of the two officers in front of the rooming house in squad car 207, it is only logical to believe that Hill was indeed the officer who told Fritz about the rooming house. Of course, this writer has no way of proving that this was the case.

As this writer has stated previously in the essay entitled Gerald Hill and 1026 North Beckley, researcher Lee Farley has made the case that Oswald did not live at the rooming house, and that it was in fact Larry Crafard who was living there at the time of the assassination (See the thread entitled: A House of Cards? on Greg Parker’s research forum). It is this writer’s belief that Crafard was Tippit’s killer, and that Hill picked him up from the rooming house and dropped him off near the intersection of Tenth and North Marsalis streets. But if this truly was the case, then why would Hill tell Fritz about the rooming house? As most researchers are aware, the DPD claimed that they found several of Oswald’s belongings there. As researcher Lee Farley has pointed out, Oswald’s belongings may have been moved into the rooming house following the assassination by certain DPD officers such as Harry Olsen, whilst all of Crafard’s belongings were moved out (see the thread entitled Randle & Frazier contradictions on Greg Parker’s research forum). If this was the case (as this writer believes it was), then this would certainly explain why Hill would tell Fritz about the rooming house.

Click here to go to part 2. My appreciation goes out to researcher Greg Parker for generously taking the time to proof read the essay prior to it being published on this blog.

Sunday, 8 June 2014

Gerald Hill and 1026 North Beckley


[Please note: The following was originally intended to be published as part of this writer’s essay on Gerald Hill, which can be read (here) on the CTKA.net website].

As stated previously in the essay, if Hill left the TSBD at approximately 12:58 pm, and travelled to the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley via Commerce Street; by this writer’s calculation, at an average speed of 50 mph, Hill could have arrived there at approximately 1:01 pm. During a discussion on whether or not DPD squad car 207 was seen outside the rooming house by the housekeeper, Earlene Roberts, at approximately 1:01 pm, Richard Gilbride told this writer that “…local TV coverage of the assassination first aired at 12:58 pm…” (See the thread entitled Gerald Hill and the murder of J.D Tippit, on Greg Parker’s research forum). During her interview with KLIF radio on the afternoon of the assassination, Roberts claimed that she received a telephone call from a friend who told her that the President had been shot (click here). Roberts went on to explain that her friend told her to turn on the TV, and that after doing so, she saw the man she thought was Oswald enter the rooming house. As far as this writer is concerned, Roberts’ friend was never interviewed by the authorities.
Roberts also indicated that Oswald came into the rooming house after she turned on the TV when she was interviewed by the FBI on the day of the assassination, and on November 27 and 29, 1963 (WCD 5, pages 353 to 356). She also repeated this claim in her affidavit to the USSS on December 5, 1963, and when she testified before the Warren Commission on April 8, 1964 (WC Volume VI, page 438), (WC Volume VII, page 439). During her aforementioned interview with the FBI on November 29, 1963, Roberts explained that she recalled hearing the TV announcer state that the president had been shot and that he was at Parkland hospital. Although some researchers may believe that this places Oswald inside the rooming house at 12:58 pm, such a belief assumes that Roberts’ friend called her almost immediately upon learning that the President had been shot. However, for all we know, given the shock of learning that the President had been shot, Roberts’ friend may have been transfixed in front of the television for a couple of minutes prior to calling her. Secondly, such a belief also assumes that Roberts’ friend was watching the TV just as the news that the President had been shot was aired. However, she may have turned on the TV a couple of minutes after the first announcement was aired.
Furthermore, we should keep in mind that during her aforementioned interviews with KLIF radio, the FBI (and in her affidavit to the USSS and during her testimony before the Warren Commission), Roberts failed to mention how much time had elapsed from the time she turned on the TV to the time she saw the man she thought was Oswald enter the rooming house. Although the overwhelming majority of JFK assassination researchers believe that Oswald did in fact live at the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley, researcher Lee Farley has made the case that Oswald did not live there, and that it was in fact Larry Crafard who was living there at the time of the assassination. Crafard was an employee of Jack Ruby’s, who not only bore a resemblance to Oswald and was mistaken for him by a number of witnesses, but who also mysteriously left Dallas on the day following the assassination (WCE 2250), (Thread entitled: A House of Cards? on Greg Parker’s research forum). As stated previously in the essay, it is this writer’s belief that Crafard was Tippit’s killer. It is also this writer’s belief that Crafard was picked up by DPD squad car 207, and was then dropped off somewhere to the East of the Tippit murder scene.
The reader should keep in mind that Earlene Roberts told the FBI during her interview with them on November 29, 1963, that one of the officers inside the DPD squad car which she observed outside the rooming house blew the horn of the car, after “Oswald” had returned there at about 1 pm (WCD 5, page 356). The obvious implication is that the car was waiting for “Oswald” after he entered the rooming house. Although Roberts told the Warren Commission that “Oswald” stayed in his room at the rooming house for “about 3 or 4 minutes”, she also claimed that “Oswald” stayed in his room “…just long enough, I guess, to go in there and get a jacket and put it on and he went out zipping it” (WC Volume VI, pages 438 and 440). Roberts’ latter claim implies that “Oswald” didn’t stay in his room for about three or four minutes, but left sooner. In fact, during her aforementioned interview with KLIF radio just a few hours after the assassination, she claimed that after “Oswald” came into the rooming house he; “…got a short gray coat and went on back out in a hurry…”
We should also bear in mind that Roberts made no mention of “Oswald” staying in his room for any length of time; implying instead that he stayed only for a short period of time after he returned. Besides, if the man Roberts thought was Oswald was actually Larry Crafard, and if Crafard was in fact Tippit’s killer; and with Gerald Hill waiting outside to pick him up in DPD squad car 207, it makes little sense that he would stay at the rooming house for over a minute. As for why he (Crafard) returned there just prior to killing Tippit, this writer can only speculate that it was to pick up the revolver (WCE 143) used to kill Tippit (see here for why this writer believes that WCE 143 was the gun used to kill Tippit). Many researchers have challenged Roberts’ credibility; claiming in so many words that her story about seeing a DPD squad car outside the rooming house (as “Oswald” was allegedly inside) lacks merit. However, as this writer explains below, the arguments against Roberts’ credibility are rather narrow minded. This writer should point out that Roberts told the Warren Commission “…I can’t see too good how to read. I’m completely blind in my right eye” (WC Volume VI, page 444). However, there’s no reason to believe that Roberts couldn’t have identified the number of the squad car with her left eye.
In the 2013 (kindle) edition of his book With Malice, disinformation shill Dale Myers cites the reports by DPD captain William R. Westbrook and Captain Orville A. Jones, in which Westbrook and Jones wrote that Officer Jim Valentine handed the keys to squad car 207 over to Sgt. James A. Putnam upon his arrival at Dealey Plaza, and that the keys to the car (including other DPD cars parked in the immediate vicinity) were then released to the third platoon commander at approximately 3:30 pm (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 7, Folder 7, Item 6). Although Valentine allegedly typed a statement in which he claimed that he had handed the keys over to Sgt. Putnam, his signature is missing from the statement (ibid). Whilst the alleged statement by Valentine is not the only typed statement amongst the DPD files which is not signed, it’s important to keep in mind that Valentine made absolutely no mention of handing the keys to squad car 207 over to Sgt. Putnam when he was interviewed by the FBI on May 28, 1964.
During his interview with the FBI, Valentine merely claimed that squad car 207 was “…definitely not in use at 1:00 p.m., and, further, that he [Valentine] did not drive to the Oak Cliff area…” (WCE 2645). Now if Valentine told the FBI that he handed the keys to squad car 207 over to Sgt. Putnam, why would the FBI omit this bit of information? It makes no sense to this writer. Myers doesn’t mention this fact to his readers. It is also curious that in the aforementioned statement (and during his interview with the FBI), Valentine allegedly wrote that he was in the Juvenile Bureau of the DPD when he learned that the President had been shot; and made no mention of Hill and Jim Ewell being in the car with him. However, Hill told the Warren Commission that after Captain Westbrook allegedly told him to go down to the TSBD, he “…got on the elevator on the third floor [of the Dallas Municipal building] and went to the basement and saw a uniformed Officer named Jim. M. Valentine, and I asked Jim what he was doing, and he said, ‘Nothing in particular’” (WC Volume VII, page 45).
Although this writer is of the firm belief that Hill lied when he claimed he went to the Tippit murder scene with Sgt. Calvin “Bud” Owens and assistant Dallas attorney, William F. Alexander, this writer can think of no reason why Hill would lie about the above. If Hill’s claim that Valentine told him “Nothing in particular” is accurate after he asked him what he was doing, then it would seem that Valentine didn’t learn about the President’s assassination when he was allegedly in the juvenile Bureau of the DPD. Readers should keep in mind that according to Chief Curry, the Juvenile bureau was located on the third floor of the Dallas Municipal building (WC Volume IV, page 152). Given these facts, the distinct possibility exists that Valentine’s statement was actually typed by someone pretending to be him (such as Captain Westbrook), and that he was coerced into not telling the FBI that Hill was in the car with him when he went to the TSBD. It is also entirely possible that he was coerced into informing the FBI that he had handed the keys to car 207 over to Sgt. Putnam, but simply forgot to mention it.
This writer should also point out that Valentine was never called to testify before the Warren Commission; even though he should have been. Myers also writes in his book that “[Sgt.] Putnam stated that [squad car 207] was never moved until late in the afternoon” (With Malice, chapter 3).In his endnotes. Myers sources this claim to an interview of Captain Orville Jones (WCD 205, page 532). But what Myers doesn’t tell his readers is that there is absolutely no confirmation from Putnam himself that he was given the keys to Squad car 207; and the keys to the other squad cars in the vicinity of the TSBD following the assassination for that matter. In fact, during his testimony before the Warren Commission, Putnam was asked what the nature of his involvement was with the investigation of the assassination of President Kennedy. Putnam claimed; “Just to assist in covering of the Book Depository Building and aiding in searching the building,” and made no mention of being given the keys to the squad cars parked in the vicinity of the TSBD (WC Volume VII, page 75).
Now if Putnam’s duty really was to be given the keys to the squad cars which arrived at the TSBD, then it makes little sense that he would be involved in searching the building, rather than being stationed outside where he could collect the keys just as the various Officers arrived and parked their squad cars. We should also keep in mind that Charles Batchelor, the assistant Chief of the DPD, informed the FBI that “…his records further indicate that patrolman J.M. Valentine was the sole occupant of car number 207 on November 22, 1963” (WCE 2645). Whilst this writer doesn’t dispute the notion that Valentine was the only Officer assigned to car 207 on the day of the assassination, the fact is that he was not the sole “occupant” of the car, as both Hill and Jim Ewell went to the TSBD with him. We should also keep in mind that neither Batchelor nor Captain C.E. Talbert (who was the commander of the second platoon) told the FBI that the keys to the parked squad cars were handed over to Sgt. Putnam (ibid). On a final note, as far as this writer is aware, there is no confirmation from Captain James M. Souter (who was the commander of the third platoon) that the keys to the squad cars were handed over to him at approximately 3:30 pm.
Whilst this writer doesn’t dispute the notion that Valentine was the only Officer assigned to car 207 on the day of the assassination, the fact is that he was not the sole “occupant” of the car, as both Hill and Jim Ewell went to the TSBD with him. As stated previously, the obvious implication is that the squad car seen outside the rooming house by Earlene Roberts was waiting for “Oswald” after he entered the rooming house. Since the DPD arrested Oswald for the murder of Tippit, Roberts’ claim would have by all likelihood led to speculation by the news media that the DPD were involved with Oswald in the murder of one of their own officers. With that in mind, are we to honestly believe that the DPD wouldn’t do everything in their power to discredit Roberts’ as a witness? Of course they would, not that those with an agenda of their own to discredit Roberts; such as Dale Myers, would ever admit to this. In his book, Myers writes that; “In assessing Mrs. Roberts’ credibility, it is worth noting that she didn’t mention the police car until five days after the assassination” (With Malice, Chapter 3).
In his endnotes, Myers sources this claim to Roberts’ interview with the FBI on November 29, 1963. Therefore, he is wrong in stating that she didn’t mention the car until fives after the assassination. But in his zeal to discredit Roberts, Myers discounts the possibility that Roberts did tell the DPD officers who arrived at 1026 North Beckley following the assassination that she had seen the squad car outside the rooming house, and that she heard one of the officers inside the car blow the horn. If she did, then for the reasons stated above, she surely would have been told to keep quiet about it. As a matter of fact, it is this writers’ belief that Roberts may have seen “Oswald” getting into the squad car, and may have even have mentioned this to the DPD officers who arrived at the rooming house following Oswald’s arrest. With the knowledge that Oswald was arrested for the murder of Tippit, one can only imagine the looks on the faces of those officers if Roberts did in fact tell them about it.
There can be little doubt that if Roberts did tell them that she had seen “Oswald” getting into the squad car, she would have been pressured into keeping quiet about it. This writer should also point out that during her interview with the FBI on November 29, 1963, Roberts claimed that after one of the Officers honked the horn of the car it “…drove slowly on Beckley [Avenue] towards Zangs Boulevard” (WCD 5, page 356). When she testified before the Warren Commission, Roberts explained that the car drove around the corner of Beckley to Zangs, onto Zangs, heading north towards town (WC Volume VI, page 443). During her aforementioned interview with KLIF radio on the afternoon of the assassination, Roberts stated that she observed “Oswald” standing at a bus stop near the rooming house (but didn’t see him board a bus). If this claim is true, then perhaps this is where the squad car picked up Crafard. As for Roberts’ claim that see observed the squad car heading towards town, it is entirely feasible that the car turned right onto North Crawford Street, and started heading south towards the Tippit murder scene (be sure to check Google Maps).
The reader should keep in mind that something which Myers and others with an agenda to discredit Roberts evidently want to ignore is that Roberts told the Warren Commission that Captain Fritz’s men, Sheriff Decker’s men, the FBI, and the USSS put her through “the third degree” (WC Volume VI, page 436). Readers should keep in mind that the reason Roberts may not have mentioned seeing the squad car outside the rooming house to the DPD was because she may have thought that they were already aware of it. Think about it. If Roberts really did see a DPD squad car outside the rooming house, it is entirely feasible that she had assumed that the DPD Officers who were at the rooming house following the assassination already knew about. But to those with an agenda to discredit Roberts, none of these explanations matter.
In his book, Myers uses Amy Gladys Johnson; the owner of the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley, to discredit Roberts’ claim of seeing the DPD squad car. As Myers writes, Mrs. Johnson told the Warren Commission that Roberts was someone who would make up tales (With Malice, Chapter 3). This writer should point out that Mrs Johnson told the FBI when they interviewed her on June 8, 1964, that Roberts was 59 years old, had a “low mentality,” and that she (Roberts) was a diabetic (WCE 2996). When Roberts testified before the Warren Commission, she claimed that she was indeed a diabetic (WC Volume VI, page 435). But despite Johnson’s claim that Roberts was someone who would make up tales and had a “low mentality,” consider that if the DPD had intimidated Roberts into keeping quiet about seeing the DPD squad car outside the rooming house, it is only perfectly reasonable to assume that they would coerce Johnson (and others) into discrediting Roberts.
Readers should also bear in mind that as researcher Lee Farley has explained, Johnson was quite likely involved in covering up the fact that it was Larry Crafard and not Oswald who had been living at the rooming house on 1026 North Beckley (see the thread entitled A House of Cards? on Greg Parker’s research forum). As stated previously, Roberts claimed that she was a diabetic. The significance of this claim is that research has shown that diabetics tend to experience memory problems; due to the high amount of blood glucose (see here for example). Therefore, this (along with the fact that at the time of the assassination, Roberts was close to the age of 60) could explain why after being coerced into keeping quiet about seeing the DPD squad car outside the rooming house, Roberts told the FBI on November 29, 1963, that she had seen it. But if Roberts simply forgot that she was to keep quiet about seeing the squad car, and if she had seen “Oswald” getting into it, why didn’t she inform the FBI of this? Consider that for the aforementioned reasons, Roberts may have forgotten about certain details of what she had witnessed. It is also worth bearing in mind that research has shown that diabetics may be “cognitively impaired” (see here).
In his book, Myers also uses former Dallas assistant district attorney William F. Alexander and former Dallas Morning News reporter Hugh Aynesworth, to discredit Roberts’ claim of seeing the DPD squad car outside the rooming house. When Myers interviewed Alexander and Aynesworth, both of them claimed that Roberts didn’t mention anything about the squad car to either one of them when they were both (allegedly) at the rooming house in the afternoon of the assassination (With Malice, Chapter 3). But as this writer will explain in an upcoming essay, by all likelihood, Alexander was lying when he claimed that Hill went with him and Sgt. Owens’ (in Owens’ car) to the Tippit murder scene, in order to cover-up for Hill’s presence outside the rooming house inside squad car 207. According to Myers, Aynesworth told him that he was at the rooming house on the afternoon of the assassination after the DPD officers who had gone there left (ibid).
Most researchers who are aware of him know that Aynesworth is a die in the wool defender of the Warren Commission’s conclusion that Oswald killed both Tippit and President Kennedy (see here for example). So even if Aynesworth spoke with Roberts on the afternoon of the assassination, and if she told him about seeing the squad car, Aynesworth’s claim that she didn’t mention this to him should be taken with a grain of salt. In fact, as this writer will explain in an upcoming essay, there is good reason to believe that Aynesworth was also covering up for Hill’s presence outside the rooming house inside squad car 207. Suffice it to say, contrary to what an agenda driven shill such as Dale Myers wants us to believe, neither Johnson, Alexander, nor Aynesworth are to be considered credible witnesses when it comes to Earlene Roberts credibility.
Several researchers have also argued that Roberts’ claim of seeing the squad car is not credibility, since she told the Warren Commission that the number of the car was not 207. When Counsel Joseph Ball asked Roberts if she remembered what the number of the squad car was, she claimed “I think it was –106, it seems to me like it was 106…” (WC Volume VI, page 443). But after Ball reminded her that she told the FBI on November 29, 1963, that the number of the car was 207, she now claimed that the number was 107, and remarked that “I don’t know where I got that 106 –207” (ibid, page 444). On the day of the assassination, squad car 106 was assigned to two officers named B.L. Jones and M.D. Hall (WCE 2645). According to the transcripts of channel one of the DPD radio communications, at approximately 12:45 pm, Jones and Hall report that they are at the location of the TSBD (WCE 1974). A photograph taken by Dallas Times Herald staff photographer, William Allen (which can be viewed here), shows that car 106 was in the vicinity of the TSBD following the assassination.
As for squad car 107, assistant DPD chief Charles Batchelor informed Norman Redlich of the Warren Commission staff that squad car 107 was not in use on the day of the assassination (WCE 2045). According to Batchelor, car 107 had been sold on April 17, 1963, and that the DPD didn’t resume using the number 107 until February, 1964 (ibid). It is this writer’s belief that the DPD coerced Roberts into claiming that the number of the squad car she had seen was 107 in order to discredit her prior claim to the FBI that she had seen squad car 207. Think about it. By coercing her into testifying that she had seen a squad car with a number which wasn’t in use on the day of the assassination, the DPD probably thought that they would succeed in discrediting her as a credible witness.
It is also this writers’ opinion that the DPD coerced her into claiming that the number of the car was 107, due to its similarity to the number 207. They may have thought that they could convince the Warren Commission that Roberts had meant to tell the FBI when they interviewed her that she had seen car 107; but that due to the similarity of the two numbers, she “mistakenly” told them that the number of the car was 207. As pointed out above, Roberts first told the Warren Commission that the number of the car she had seen was 106. Given Roberts’ age, and the fact that she was a diabetic, it is entirely possible that she misremembered that she was supposed to say 107; only to then remember and “correct” herself. Whilst some might argue that this is an absurd explanation, consider that due to the similarity of the numbers 106 and 107, she could easily have confused the two numbers.
Although the reader might be wondering why the DPD didn’t simply allow Roberts to maintain that the number of the car she observed was 207, and to then tell the Warren Commission that car 207 was not in use on the day of the assassination, the simple fact of the matter is that they couldn’t. The DPD would surely have known from their records that car 207 on the day of the assassination, it was assigned to Officer Jim Valentine, and that since Valentine had driven it to the scene of the assassination; it was by all likelihood filmed and/or photographed by the news media. As a matter of fact, as this writer has stated previously in the essay, it was filmed outside the TSBD (click here and go to the 14 minute 50 second mark). With that in mind, it is with little doubt that the DPD realised that by claiming squad car 207 was not in use on the day of the assassination, photographs and film footage could have exposed this as being a lie.
One alternative would have been for the DPD to somehow seize every photograph and film footage taken outside the TSBD without a subpoena, in order to try and conceal the existence of car 207. In this writer’s opinion, this notion is so patently absurd, that it is unimaginable that any intellectually honest researcher would seriously advocate it. The reader may also be wondering why the DPD didn’t simply coerce Roberts into telling the Warren Commission that she didn’t actually see any squad car, instead of coercing her into claiming that the number of the squad car she observed was 107. In this writer’s opinion, the DPD probably thought that it would be obvious to the Warren Commission that they (the DPD) had harassed Roberts into making this claim. However, by coercing her into claiming that she had seen a DPD squad car with a number which was not in use on the day of the assassination, the DPD may have thought that the Warren Commission would believe that Roberts was a delusional old lady who had imagined seeing the squad car.
This writer should also point out that Roberts told the Warren Commission that the car she had seen was black, and that “It wasn’t an accident squad car at all” (WC Volume VI, page 444). However, Roberts may have misremembered what the color of the car was, or she may have been coerced by the DPD into making this claim to discredit her (bear in mind that the aforementioned film footage of squad car 207 reveals that it was not black). What’s particularly intriguing to this writer, is that in her discussion of what the number of the squad car was, Roberts remarked; “I want you to understand that I have been put through the third degree and it’s hard to remember” (ibid). It’s almost as if Roberts was claiming that the DPD had harassed her into changing the number of the car. Although it is certainly not this writer’s contention that Roberts deliberately said this during her testimony, this writer should point out that she probably inadvertently said this due to the stress she was feeling from lying under oath.
Before concluding the discussion of Earlene Roberts’ credibility, there is one other issue to be discussed. When Roberts was interviewed by the FBI on November 29, 1963, she told them that the reason she recalled the number of the squad car was because she had “…worked for two Policemen who drove squad car 170, and she looked to see if these were the two officers she knew parked in front of the residence” (WCD 5, page 356). Although she didn’t name the two officers she worked for, when Roberts testified before the Warren Commission, she claimed that the two officers were named Charles Burnely and Alexander, but didn’t specify whether Alexander was the officer’s first or last name (WC Volume VI, page 443). According to the personnel assignments booklet of the DPD, there was a Charles T. Burnley who worked for the Burglary and Theft Bureau in November, 1963 (WC Volume XIX, Batchelor exhibit No. 5002). Although there doesn’t appear to be a listing for an officer with the name Alexander in the booklet, there was an officer named Floyd T. Alexander; a ballistics expert who worked for the Dallas City-Council Criminal Investigation Laboratory from 1957 to 1969 (With Malice, Chapter 3).
When Roberts testified before the Warren Commission, she explained that “I had worked for some Policemen and sometimes they come by and tell me something that maybe their wives would want me to know, and I thought it was them, and I just glanced out and saw the number, and I said, ‘Oh that’s not their car,’ for I knew their car” (WC Volume VI, page 443). Roberts also claimed that one of the officers inside the DPD car honked the horn in the same way in which officers Burnely and Alexander would (ibid). In the year 1997, Dale Myers interviewed Charles Burnley, who happened to be the only officer with the surname Burnley working for the DPD at the time of the assassination (With Malice, Chapter 3). According to Myers, Burnley told him that he didn’t hear about Roberts’ allegation until about four or five years before Myers interviewed him (ibid). Burnley went on to explain that; “I joined the [DPD] in 1955 and as far as I know, I was the only Burnley that ever worked there. The only Alexander I knew of was a Lieutenant in charge of the crime lab out at Parkland hospital [Floyd T. Alexander] in the mid 1950’s. But, I never met him.
Burnley then remarked; “My impression was that Roberts claimed that she worked as a maid or something for us, but at that time, I was living with my mother and dad. I didn’t have any need for her services and certainly didn’t know her” (ibid). Myers then explains that it isn’t known whether Roberts knew Floyd T. Alexander, but writes that there was a Floyd J. Alexander who allegedly worked for the DPD from 1947 to 1957 and knew Roberts (ibid). Myers writes that Alexander “remembered” that Roberts “wasn’t very bright, had a limited number of friends, and would do almost anything to get attention” (ibid). In his endnotes, Myers references this claim to a letter (apparently) by Alexander dated September 7, 1993, in the Dennis Ford collection. He then adds that unlike Roberts’ story, Alexander didn’t have a steady partner, and didn’t “recall” Charles Burnley (ibid).
Whilst Myers and his ilk use the statements by Burnley and Alexander to discredit Roberts, let’s consider the reasons why their statements should not be used as reliable evidence against her. First of all, as stated previously (and which Myers never actually mentions to his readers) is that Roberts did not name Burnley and Alexander as the two officers who were assigned to squad car 170 when she was interviewed by the FBI on November 29, 1963. It is therefore entirely conceivable that in order to discredit Roberts’ claim of seeing a DPD squad car outside the rooming house that the DPD coerced her into stating that Charles Burnley was one of the officers who was assigned to squad car 170; when in actual fact he wasn’t. This would have made Roberts look like a liar.

Now even if Burnley was one of the officers who was assigned to squad car 170, his denial of knowing Roberts may have been due to the fact that Roberts told the Warren Commission that one of the officers in the squad car she observed outside the rooming house, honked the horn of the car like Burnley and officer Alexander allegedly would. Perhaps after learning about Roberts’ allegation, Burnley thought that people would suspect that he was one of the two officers outside the rooming house on the day of the assassination; and perhaps fearing that people would suspect him of playing a role in a conspiracy with Oswald to kill Tippit, he denied knowing Roberts. As stated previously, Roberts did not indicate whether Alexander was the first or last name of the officer she claimed she knew. In this writers’ opinion, the DPD may have coerced her into claiming she knew an officer named Alexander who was assigned to squad car 170, when in actual fact no officer named Alexander was assigned to that squad car, with the purpose of making her look like a liar.

Readers should also keep in mind that according to assistant DPD chief, Charles Batchelor, squad car 170 was sold in April, 1963, and the number 170 was not reassigned to another squad car until February, 1964 (WCE 2645). As mentioned previously, Batchelor also claimed that squad car 107 was sold on April 17, 1963, and that the number 107 was not reassigned to another squad car until February, 1964 (WCE 2045). But what are the odds that both of these squad cars were sold in the exact same month, and that both the number 170 and 107 were not reassigned to another squad car until the following February? Although this writer believes that there probably wasn’t a squad car with the number 107 in use on the day of the assassination, Batchelor’s claim that squad car 170 was sold in April, 1963, appears to be nothing but a lie to discredit Roberts’ claim of working for the two officers who were assigned to that car.

Although Roberts told both the FBI and the Warren Commission that the two officers inside the squad car were wearing uniforms (whereas Gerald Hill was dressed in plain clothes on the day of the assassination), this may have merely been an assumption on her part, as it is commonly known that officers who are assigned to squad cars wear uniforms. Whilst the reader may not agree with all of the arguments above concerning Earlene Roberts, the fact remains that she told the FBI on November 29, 1963, that the number of the squad car she observed outside the rooming house was 207. As this writer explained previously in the essay on Hill; by all likelihood, Hill was lying when he claimed that he was on the sixth floor of the TSBD when Dallas deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney discovered the spent shell casings. Furthermore, as this writer explains here, assistant Dallas district attorney William Alexander was (by all likelihood) lying when he claimed that Hill went with him and Sgt. Owens’ (in Owens’ car) to the Tippit murder scene.

Sunday, 25 May 2014

Discussion of my new essay on Gerald Hill


Now that Jim DiEugenio and John Kelin have published my essay concerning Gerald Hill’s complicity in framing Lee Harvey Oswald for the murder of Officer J.D. Tippit (which can be read here on the CTKA.net website), in this blog post, I plan on responding to the various questions, feedback, and criticisms concerning the essay from various forums and websites, to the best of my ability when I have the time.

Posted June 4, 2014:


Apparently, some of the links in the essay still aren’t working. For those of you who are unable to view the film footage of Hill smiling after he is asked if he thinks Oswald is the same man who shot Tippit, I have provided the link to it here (Hill can be seen smiling at about the 59 minute 40 second mark).

Posted June 8, 2014:


As I wrote in my essay; “Hill also remarked that Oswald was subdued, disarmed, and handcuffed (in that order) during a filmed interview with news reporters on the day of the assassination…” In another filmed interview with news reporters on the day of the assassination (which can be viewed here), Hill explained that Oswald was subdued, disarmed, and handcuffed (in that order).

Posted June 11, 2014:

On Jefferson Morley’s website “JFK Facts,” a poster named Ronnie Wayne wrote the following concerning my essay in response to another poster named Sandy K.
“Thanks for the link Sandy. I started reading the article last week but just finished it tonight. Anyone really interested in the subject should. Thanks to Mr. Yusuf and Farley in particular. The light went off for me when Hill rode the front passenger elevator to the 5th/6th floor. ! That’s impossible! Brian’s “guess” statement on 2-3 shells corroborates James Tagues’s reporters statement of 2 shells. The whole who had what gun at the Texas Theater when and O’s actions at the time are kind of mind blowing.”
This can be read here. I would like to thank Mr. Wayne for his comments. Although I’m not certain what he meant when he wrote “Brian’s “guess” statement on 2-3 shells corroborates James Tagues’s reporters statement of 2 shells,” as discussed in the essay, detective Brian’s claim that he was on the sixth floor of the TSBD is not credible, and that he was coerced into claiming that Hill was on the sixth floor when the spent shell casings were discovered to cover-up for Hill’s presence outside of the rooming house at 1026 North Beckley inside DPD squad car 207.

Posted June 15, 2014:

According to my blog statistics, many more people have read through this post, than my post concerning the (potential) arguments against Hill’s complicity in framing Oswald. I would ask that readers please take their time to read through that post, and not just this one (click here to read it).
 

Arguments against Gerald Hill's complicity


[Please note: The following discussion of the potential arguments against Gerald Hill’s complicity in framing Oswald for the murder of Officer J.D. Tippit was originally intended to be a part of this writer’s essay on Hill’s complicity. The essay can be read here on the CTKA.net website].

 Although the evidence discussed in this writer’s essay demonstrates that DPD Sgt. Gerald Hill framed Oswald for the murder of Officer J.D. Tippit, there are a number of question marks concerning his complicity. For example, some might ask why Hill wouldn’t deny having possession of “Oswald’s” revolver? As stated previously in the essay, Hill claimed that he had given the revolver to Lt. T.L. Baker of the homicide and Robbery bureau. Secondly, he was filmed showing the revolver (WCE 143) and the six live rounds inside the cylinder to reporters shortly following Oswald’s arrest. Therefore, Hill probably realised that if he lied about having possession of the revolver, Baker, the reporters, and the news footage could have proven that he was lying, and as a result, he could have come under suspicion of framing Oswald. Hill died on July 29, 2011. According to his obituary, his grade point average at the DPD academy was “…the highest ever till a few years ago” (click here to read his obituary). If this is accurate, then Hill was certainly no idiot.

Others may argue that if Hill was guilty of framing Oswald, he would also have coerced Officer Ray Hawkins (who was his subordinate) into keeping quiet about hearing him (Hill) say that he had “Oswald’s” gun. Although this is certainly a valid argument, the fact nevertheless remains that Hawkins said that Hill shouted out “I’ve got the gun.” When Hill testified before the Warren Commission, he denied seeing Oswald holding onto a gun during the scuffle inside the Theater (WC Volume VII, page 52). Whilst some might believe that if Hill framed Oswald, he undoubtedly would have said that he had seen Oswald with the gun. However, consider Hill may have thought that by denying he had seen Oswald holding the gun; the Warren Commission wouldn’t suspect him of framing Oswald. After all, it would have been in Hill’s best interest to not come under suspicion.

Perhaps one of the biggest arguments against Hill’s complicity is that he reported over the DPD radio that; “The shells at the scene indicate that the suspect is armed with an automatic 0.38, rather than a pistol.” There can be no doubt that Hill made this transmission, as the recordings of the DPD radio communications (which can be heard here on John McAdam’s website) shows that Hill was the Officer who made the aforementioned transmission. As this writer will discuss in another article on this blog, Hill was most certainly lying when he made the aforementioned transmission over the radio. The question is why? Consider that if Hill framed Oswald for Tippit’s murder with the revolver (WC 143), the last thing he would have wanted was for the DPD to suspect he was involved in the murder of one of his fellow officers. Therefore, Hill may have thought that by reporting over the radio that the spent shell casings at the murder scene indicated to him that Tippit was killed by an automatic, his fellow Officers wouldn’t have suspected him of framing Oswald.

Many conspiracy advocates are of the belief that WCE 143 was not the revolver used to kill Tippit. However, if Hill framed Oswald for Tippit’s murder, then it makes absolutely no sense that he would have WCE 143 in his possession as opposed to the actual gun used to kill Tippit. Secondly, it was determined by ballistically comparing the bullets removed from Tippit’s head and body to bullets test fired from WCE 143, that it most likely was the revolver used to kill him. As explained in part two of this writer’s review of With Malice (which can be read here), on the night of the assassination, the DPD released only one of the bullets from Tippit’s body (WCE 602) to FBI agent Vincent E. Drain (see under the subheading VIII: Proof Positive). After the bullet was examined in the FBI lab in Washington D.C. on the day following the assassination, it was determined that WCE 143; “…is among those weapons which produce general rifling impressions of the type found on [the bullet]” (WCE 2003).

As also explained in part two of this Writer’s review of With Malice (under the same subheading), the DPD did not release the four spent shell casing allegedly found in the vicinity of the Tippit murder scene to the FBI until November 28, 1963. They also neglected to release two of the bullets removed from Tippit’s body, and the bullet removed from his head, to the FBI on the night of the assassination (WCE 603-605). Captain Will Fritz told the FBI that the reason the remaining three bullets were not released to the FBI on the night of the assassination is because a record of their location had not been made. However, as explained in part two of this writer’s review of With Malice (again under the subheading VIII: Proof Positive), Fritz is not to be considered credible, and that the remaining three bullets were probably retained because the DPD was concerned that the FBI might have determined that a different gun was used to kill Tippit.

When FBI agent Courtlandt Cunningham testified before the Warren Commission on April 1, 1964, he claimed that through a ballistics examination of the four bullets removed from Tippit’s body and head, he determined that all four were 0.38 special bullets (WC Volume III, page 475). Cunningham also explained that all four of the spent shell casings allegedly found in the vicinity of the Tippit murder scene were 0.38 specials (ibid, page 465). He then went on to explain that the bullets removed from Tippit’s body and head were fired from a gun barrel with five lands and groves with a right twist; just like the barrel of WCE 143, and that the widths of the lands and grooves on the bullet surfaces were identical to the ones produced by the barrel of WCE 143 (ibid, pages 475 and 484). Although Cunningham claimed that in his opinion, all four of the spent shell casings were fired from WCE 143 “to the exclusion of all other weapons”, he nevertheless claimed that he couldn’t determine if any of the four bullets had been fired from WCE 143 (ibid, pages 466 and 475).

According to Cunningham; “[WCE 602] was too mutilated. There were not sufficient microscopic marks remaining on the surface of this bullet, due to the mutilation, to determine whether or not it had been fired from [WCE 143]” and that “[WCE 603- 605] do bear microscopic marks for comparison purposes, but it was not possible from an examination and comparison of these bullets to determine whether or not they had been fired – these bullets themselves – had been fired from one weapon, or whether or not they had been fired from Oswald’s revolver” (ibid, page 475). Cunningham’s findings were shared by FBI agents Robert A. Frazier, and Charles L. Killion (WC Volume VII, pages 590 and 591). Joseph D. Nicol, the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal identification and investigation for the state of Illinois; who independently examined the bullets removed from Tippit’s body and head, also shared Cunningham’s findings (WC Volume III, page 512). However, there was one exception.

When Nicol testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he found “sufficient individual characteristics” on WCE 603, which led him to conclude that it had been fired through the barrel of WCE 143 (ibid). The individual characteristics to which Nicol was referring to were striations on the bullet which he claimed were caused by the barrel of WCE 143 (ibid). But as even Dale Myers admits in his book, Nicol’s finding that the bullet designated as WCE 603 was fired through the barrel of WCE 143 was not shared by any of the other eight ballistics experts who examined the bullets (With Malice, Chapter 8). This writer should also point out that ballistics experts for the HSCA also came to the same conclusion as FBI agent Courtlandt Cunningham (HSCA Report, Volume VII, page 377). However, they also noted that all four of the bullets bore signs of gas erosion; which is caused by the hot gases produced during the burning of the powder used to propel the bullets when the trigger of the gun is pulled (ibid, pages 377 and 412).

According to the report; “The [firearms] panel attributed [the gas erosion] to the firing of either undersized bullets through the [WCE] 143 barrel or the barrel of the revolver having become oversized due to wear and deterioration” (ibid). The reader should keep in mind that the diameter of the barrel of WCE 143 was slightly bigger than the diameter of the 0.38 special bullets, as the barrel was originally designed for firing 0.38 Smith and Wesson bullets which have a bigger diameter (WC Volume III, page 456). Whilst some might argue that the lack of consistency between the microscopic scratches on the surfaces of the bullets and the barrel of WCE 143 means that it was not fired through it, Cunningham told the Warren Commission that; “Each time [WCE 143] was fired, the bullet would seem to pass down the barrel in a different way, which could be due to the slightly undersized bullets in the oversized 0.38 [Smith and Wesson] barrel. It would cause an erratic passage down the barrel, and thereby, cause inconsistent characteristic marks to be impressed or scratched [onto] the surface of the bullets” (ibid, page 475).

Monty Lutz of the HSCA’s firearm panel testified that the aforementioned problem can also be explained by the gas erosion of the bullet surfaces (HSCA Report, Volume I, page 486). The HSCA firearms panel were also unable to positively identify the bullets removed from Tippit’s body and head due to the “…extensive damage to the bullets…The panel attributed this to the effects of impact, penetration and wiping” (ibid, Volume VII, page ). Suffice it to say; the evidence discussed above strongly suggests that WCE 143 was the gun used to kill Tippit. But could the DPD or the FBI have switched the bullets removed from the head and body of Tippit, for ones which they fired from WCE 143, to ensure that Oswald would be found guilty of killing Tippit? As discussed in part two of this writer’s review of With Malice (under the subheading VII: Proof positive), the evidence indicates that the DPD switched the spent shell casings discovered in the vicinity of the Tippit murder scene with ones which they fired through WCE 143, to ensure that the spent shell casings they delivered to the FBI on November 28, 1963, would be identified as having been fired from it.

But if the DPD fired the bullet which they released to the FBI on the night of the assassination (WCE 602) through WCE 143 to incriminate Oswald for Tippit’s murder, then it stands to reason that they would also have substituted the four spent shell casings found in the vicinity of the Tippit murder scene, for ones which they fired from WCE 143. If this was the case, it makes little sense that they wouldn’t have released the substituted spent shell casings to the FBI on the very same night. As for the FBI, even if we are to believe that the reason the DPD delayed the release of the remaining three bullets to the FBI because a record of their location had not been made, it is entirely possible that the FBI may have substituted all four of the bullets for ones which they fired through WCE 143; and then used the excuse that they could not positively identify the bullets as being fired through the gun due to the fact that the 0.38 special bullets were fired through a slightly oversized barrel.

But in spite of this possibility, it is nevertheless a fact that Gerald Hill was filmed showing reporters WCE 143 shortly following Oswald’s arrest; and that it makes very little (if any) sense that he would frame Oswald with that gun if a different gun had been used to kill Tippit. There is very little doubt in this writer’s mind that Tippit’s killer deliberately discarded the spent shell casings, to ensure that when they would be ballistically examined by experts, they would have determined that the spent shell casings had been fired through WCE 143. If Hill had planned in advance that he would report over the DPD radio that the spent shell casings were fired from an automatic in order to divert suspicion away from himself, then perhaps the plan was for Tippit’s killer to discard them all in a small area, so that Hill could then use that as an excuse for why he “believed” the spent shell casings were fired from an automatic, if he were asked about his misidentification.

Perhaps in his haste to leave the Tippit murder scene, Tippit’s killer simply forgot to discard all of the spent shell casings in a small area near the front passenger side of Tippit’s car from where he fired the gun. Most researchers are also aware of the fact that DPD officer Howell W. Summers reported over the DPD radio that he had an “eyeball witness” who thought that Tippit’s killer was armed with a 0.32 caliber dark finish automatic (WCE 705/1974). Although it is commonly believed that the witness in question was Ted Callaway, as explained in part 1 of this writer’s review of With Malice, there is very good reason to doubt that Callaway ever observed Tippit’s killer; and that he was coerced by the DPD into identifying Oswald as the killer (see under the subheading VII: A bird in the hand). This writer also advocated the possibility that the witness in question was B.D. Searcy, who worked for the Harris Bros. auto sales under Callaway (WC Volume III, page 351).

Whilst many conspiracy advocates have used the identification of the gun as an automatic by the witness as evidence that Tippit’s killer was actually armed with an automatic, the witness could easily have been mistaken depending on the distance from which he observed the gun, and because he may have only caught a glimpse of it. This may have been because the witness in question was more concerned about what the man with the gun looked like. Others will undoubtedly argue that if Oswald didn’t carry WCE 143 into the Theater with him, he would have shouted out at the news reporters (when he had the opportunity to do so) that he didn’t have a gun when he was arrested, and that he was being framed. However, the truth is that nobody knows exactly what was going through Oswald’s mind as he was paraded before the media after being accused of killing both Tippit and the President.

In this writer’s opinion, there are several possible explanations for why Oswald didn’t claim that he was being framed and wasn’t carrying a gun on his person when arrested. For one thing, Oswald probably thought that it wouldn’t be a good idea for him to accuse the DPD of framing him whilst he was under their custody and to wait until his forthcoming trial in court to make such an accusation through his defence counsel. After all, Oswald probably would have realised that if he did make such an accusation, it wouldn’t have done him any good, as the DPD would have denied the accusation without even the slightest hesitation. Furthermore, Oswald may have thought that the news reporters would simply have scoffed at him for accusing the DPD of framing him.

It is also not beyond the realm of possibility to believe that due to the shock of being arrested and then accused of killing a Police Officer (and betrayed by those who lured him to the Texas theater), and due to the stress, embarrassment, and humiliation of being paraded before the media, Oswald was not able to think clearly enough to deny carrying a gun and to explain that he was being framed. Although it may be easy for researchers who haven’t been in Oswald’s place to dismiss the aforementioned reasons as being ridiculous, the truth is that these same researchers cannot state as a fact that such is the case. There may also be another explanation for why Oswald didn’t proclaim before the media that he was being framed and didn’t carry a gun into the Theater. As the inimitable Australian researcher Greg Parker has discussed on his research forum, Oswald likely had Asperger’s syndrome (see the thread entitled: Why Oswald was more likely to have suffered Asperger’s than Dyslexia). The reader is strongly encouraged to read through Parker’s discussion.

In his online book The complete guide to Asperger’s syndrome (which can be read here), Dr. Tony Attwood writes that; “Increased stress levels, especially when trying to engage in a conversation in a crowded area, can affect the language comprehension and verbal fluency of the person with Asperger’s syndrome” (page 224). As Attwood also writes; “Verbal fluency is affected by anxiety…being lost for words or even mute may be due to high level of anxiety. Certainly some adults with Asperger’s syndrome are prone to stuttering when anxious. Here the problem is not strictly impairment in language skills, but the effect of emotion on the ability to speak” (pages 223 and 224). There can be little doubt that Oswald would have been feeling a high level of anxiety as he was paraded before the media. Therefore, if Oswald had Asperger’s syndrome (as Parker’s research indicates) then this could also explain why he didn’t proclaim before the news reporters that he was being framed, and that he wasn’t carrying a gun when he was arrested.

The reader should keep in mind that all five of the officers who escorted Oswald to DPD headquarters following his arrest claimed that Oswald admitted to having WCE 143 with him inside the Theater en route to Police headquarters (Dallas Municipal archives, Box 2, Folder 7, Items 12 and 28), (WC Volume VII, pages 40 and 61). In fact, detective Paul Bentley made this claim during his filmed interview with WFAA-TV on the day following the assassination (see here). But as discussed in part 2 of this writer’s review of With Malice, the DPD needed Oswald to be found guilty for Tippit’s murder, to make it appear as though he was a cold blooded murderer who was also capable of assassinating the President. Whilst some might argue that this is a ridiculous notion, consider that with the President of the United States of America arrogantly gunned down in broad daylight and in full public view; and with the entire United States (and the world for that matter) anxiously waiting to learn who was responsible for that heinous act, the DPD needed someone to be found guilty! Otherwise, they would have faced severe shame and humiliation after telling the public that they didn’t know who was responsible.

As many researchers such as Jim DiEugenio have pointed out, during the tenure of Henry Wade as the district attorney of Dallas, the DPD were responsible for helping to convict people for crimes which they didn’t commit (readers are strongly encouraged to read through this article on the corruption of both Wade and the DPD). There can be little doubt that Tippit’s killer would have resembled Oswald somewhat, in the hope that any would be witnesses would be able to tell the DPD that Oswald was Tippit’s killer. Given the information the DPD undoubtedly had from Gerald Hill that Oswald was allegedly carrying WCE 143 when he was arrested inside the Theater; and the fact that he left the TSBD shortly following the assassination, the DPD could then argue that Oswald shot Tippit in cold blood to avoid being arrested for the President’s assassination.

But if the DPD had coerced Bentley and others into claiming that Oswald admitted to carrying the gun into the Theater as they escorted him to DPD headquarters, then why weren’t they also coerced into claiming that Oswald admitted to shooting Tippit? Consider that if Oswald really did admit to killing Tippit, there can be no doubt that the media would have known about his confession on the day of the assassination; and that it would have made the headlines. The DPD (and Hill for that matter) must have realised that they didn’t have a legitimate excuse for why they didn’t inform the media about Oswald’s “confession” to killing Tippit on the day of the assassination, and that this is the reason why Bentley and others weren’t coerced into claiming that Oswald confessed to killing Tippit. But since the DPD needed Oswald to have at least admitted to carrying WCE 143 with him inside the Theater, Bentley and others were coerced into claiming that this was the case.

It is also worthwhile keeping in mind that in his book, Tony Attwood also writes that; “Experience has indicated that people with Asperger’s who have committed a [criminal] offence have often been quick to confess and justify their actions” (page 339). According to Attwood, this is because “They cannot understand what all the fuss is about; their actions were logical, justified and appropriate and described without any associated emotions or remorse” (ibid). In fact, Attwood also writes that; “The overwhelming majority of people with Asperger’s syndrome are law-abiding citizens, often with very clear and conventional opinions as to what is morally and legally right and wrong” (page 335). Therefore, if Oswald had Asperger’s syndrome; and if he really did assassinate President Kennedy and then kill Tippit, he likely would have confessed to committing the crimes.

When Hill testified before the Warren Commission, he claimed that he told the FBI that he knew Jack Ruby prior to the assassination (WC Volume VII, page 63). The majority of conspiracy advocates believe that Ruby was involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, and was used to kill Oswald. Commonly cited reasons for Oswald’s murder include the following: Oswald was involved in the conspiracy to assassinate the President in some capacity, and was killed to prevent him from possibly revealing the names of the conspirators etc. Another belief is that because Oswald was framed for the assassination of the President, he was killed to prevent him from possibly being acquitted in court. Whilst the reader may believe that Hill wouldn’t have told the FBI, and then the Warren Commission, that he knew Ruby if they were both involved in the assassination of the President, consider that Hill may have thought that by making such an admission, the FBI and the Warren Commission wouldn’t have suspected that he was involved with Ruby in the President’s assassination.

Although Hill told the FBI on November 25, 1963, that his “…association with Jack Ruby consisted strictly of contacts with Ruby on business matters,” former DPD Officer Harry Olsen (a man whose own actions on the day of the assassination have come under suspicion) told former FBI agent and investigator for Jim Garrison; William Turner, that Hill was the most frequent visitor to Ruby’s Carousel club (click here to read the interview), (WCD 4, page 309). As this writer has previously pointed out in the essay on Hill, it was Hill who informed the DPD as to the whereabouts of Harry Olsen after he left Dallas. It is therefore possible that after learning that Ruby was suspected of being involved in the assassination, Olsen may have told Turner that Hill was the most frequent visitor to the Carousel club to get back at him by making it appear as though Hill could have been involved in the assassination.

But if this truly was the case, then it stands to reason that Olsen would have told Turner that he suspected Hill of being involved in the assassination. With this in mind, it is this writer’s opinion that Olsen was probably being truthful when he told Turner that Hill was the most frequent visitor to the Carousel club. Some might argue that it is of no real significance that Ruby was acquainted with Hill, since he was acquainted with many DPD Officers. However, it is this writer’s opinion that Olsen’s claim is significant since Hill likely framed Oswald for Tippit’s murder, and since Ruby was the man who ultimately killed him. Most researchers of the assassination are also aware of the allegation that Oswald used a long paper sack to carry the rifle he allegedly used to assassinate the President, which the DPD purportedly discovered on the sixth floor of the TSBD next to the window from where the President was shot. As several researchers such as Ian Griggs and Pat Speer have shown, the DPD lied about discovering the sack next to the aforementioned window (click here to read Speer’s discussion of the alleged discovery on his website).

During his testimony before the Warren Commission, Hill denied seeing the long sack when he was on the sixth floor of the TSBD (WC Volume VII, page 65). Although some might argue that Hill surely would have stated that he had seen the sack if he was guilty of framing Oswald, such a belief assumes that every DPD Officer who was present on the sixth floor of the TSBD following the assassination was coerced into claiming that they had seen it. To give the reader an example of why this isn’t true, let’s consider the testimonies of detective Richard Sims, and his partner Elmer Boyd. Although Sims told the Warren Commission that he had seen the so-called sack, Boyd told the Commission; “I don’t believe I did” (ibid, pages 122 and 162). In fact, not even Captain Fritz claimed during his testimony before the Warren Commission that he had seen the so-called paper gun sack, stating instead that he wasn’t on the sixth floor of the TSBD when it was allegedly discovered there (WC Volume IV, page 220).

When Hill was interviewed by Bob Whitten of KCRA radio on the day of the assassination, he told Whitten that “…a gun was found on the sixth floor [of the TSBD] where it had been hidden; that – I have been told and I can’t verify this either way; it was an officer – it was made in Argentina” (WCD 1210, page 5). Unlike the majority of conspiracy advocates, it this writer’s belief that the Italian made Mannlicher Carcano rifle was the gun used to shoot the President from the sixth floor of the TSBD. Even if Hill was being truthful when he stated that another Officer told him that the rifle was made in Argentina, why would he state this on radio if he was involved in the conspiracy to assassinate the President, and if the Italian made Mannlicher Carcano rifle was used to shoot him? Again, we should consider the possibility that Hill may have only said this so that he wouldn’t be suspected of being involved in the President’s assassination.

On a final note, there is one other possible argument against Hill’s complicity this writer would like to address. According to Hill’s obituary; “[Hill] was also a Dallas County Constable and [during] the last 8 years of his life [he] worked with the security staff at the Duncanville High School. During all this time he served the community of Duncanville in the Lion's Club, Friends of the Duncanville Public Library and the Duncanville Community Theatre. He was a City Council Member and served on several boards. He was a long time active member at Duncanville's First Baptist Church.” Although some might argue that a man who was involved in the murder of one of his fellow Police Officers and in the framing of an innocent for that murder, couldn’t possibly have been involved in the above, it is entirely possible that Hill may have come to regret (for one reason or another) his involvement in the assassination, Tippit’s murder, and for framing Oswald. He may have thought that by partaking in the above, he would (in a way) make up for his past sins.

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

Greg Parker's interview with Len Osanic

Greg Parker recently discussed volume one of his book Lee Harvey Oswald's cold war: Why the Kennedy assassination should be reinvestigated on Len Osanic's black op radio show (here). I highly recommend that everyone take their time to listen to it!

Wednesday, 12 March 2014

Greg Parker's book is now available for purchase

Volume one of Greg Parker’s book is now available for purchase (here) at Amazon.com! As stated previously on my blog, this is a book which everyone who has a genuine interest in learning who Lee Harvey Oswald really was should read. Greg has provided information on the book’s contents (including excerpts from the text) on his website here.

Let me repeat, this is a book which everyone who has a genuine interest in learning who Lee Harvey Oswald really was should read. You can take that to the bank.

Addendum:

More excerpts from the book can be read here.

Sunday, 9 March 2014

My review of Dale Myers' shitty book

Just recently, JFK assassination researchers John Kelin and Jim DiEugenio published part 1 of my lengthy review of With Malice, on the CTKA.net website (see here). The book, of course, was authored by the utterly condescending and dishonest piece of shit known as Dale Myers. There is little doubt in my mind that Myers will write a condescending and snide rebuttal to my review. After all, Myers is far too arrogant not to. Although the review is 60 pages long, there were many things which I had to leave out, as the review would be far too long otherwise.
In his rebuttal, I feel certain that some of the things which Myers will write are the following:
1). That contrary to all the evidence that the dispatchers on channel one of the DPD radio ordered all Police squads to proceed to Elm and Houston streets, the actual tape recordings do contain an order for only the squads in the downtown area to proceed to Elm and Houston streets. However, as I explain throughout my review, Myers is not to be trusted.
2). That despite the fact WCE 705 does not contain the alleged transmission by Tippit that he’s at Kiest and Bonnieview after Murray Jackson allegedly orders him to move into the central Oak Cliff area, it definitely was Tippit who made that transmission. Also, Myers will probably state that it was definitely Tippit who told Jackson that he’s at Lancaster and Eight after Jackson asks him if he’s in the Oak Cliff area. Of course, Myers will dismiss the notion that Tippit’s voice was impersonated, or that all of the so-called transmissions by Tippit over the DPD radio were substituted by somebody else’s voice in order to conceal what Tippit’s voice sounded like.
3). That “anybody with a brain” knows that contradictions between the statements of the witnesses and officers involved in Oswald’s arrest are to be expected concerning how Oswald allegedly pulled out “his” revolver and tried to shoot Officer Nick McDonald, and that it doesn’t necessarily mean they were lying. But on the contrary, anybody with a brain, and more importantly, honesty, knows that these contradictions raise serious doubts on the veracity of the notion that Oswald pulled out “his” revolver and tried to shoot McDonald. Not that Myers gives a shit, mind you.
4). It is absurd to say that Tippit’s close family members and friends would vehemently deny any allegations that Tippit may have been part of a conspiracy (as many researchers have alleged) to spare themselves any shame and embarrassment. But just consider that if Tippit was a friend of yours; or a family member, wouldn’t you feel ashamed and embarrassed to have been a friend or family member of his after he has been accused of possibly been part of a conspiracy? I sure would. But a jackass like Myers probably can’t understand something like that. Let me point out that I don’t think Tippit was involved in a conspiracy, but lured to Tenth and Patton to be shot.
5). It doesn’t really matter that he (Myers) placed contradictory evidence in his endnotes. On the contrary, it does matter, as readers may not bother to actually read the endnotes. I for one am someone who hardly ever reads the endnotes of any book I’ve read. But since I wrote a review of Myers’ book, I had to read through them.
I could go on, but I will wait to see what kind of a bullshit rebuttal Myers gives to my review. Let me state for the record that I absolutely am not an expert on Tippit’s murder, let alone President Kennedy’s assassination. However, you don’t have to be an expert to point out how dishonest Myers is when it comes to Tippit’s murder. Now, if I’ve misquoted Myers in my review and he points this out, then I will concede my errors. Let me also state that no matter what Myers might believe, his book is absolutely not the definitive book on Tippit’s murder. Just read the review and you’ll see why.
I know that many people will probably disapprove of the language I’ve used above to describe Myers, but I nevertheless stand by it. If it hurts whatever reputation I have, then so be it. I have the utmost disrespect for bullshit artists, and Myers is one of the biggest bullshit artists as far both President Kennedy’s assassination and officer Tippit’s murder is concerned. I will also not be holding back any abusive language towards Myers after reading whatever rebuttal he writes for my review of his utterly deceptive and dishonest book.